2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01315-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The moderating effect of foreign direct investment on environmental degradation-poverty reduction nexus: evidence from sub-Saharan African countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three indicators are carbon dioxide (CO2) per capita (measured in parts-per-million, ppm), methane emissions (kt of CO2 equivalent) and nitrous oxide emissions (thousand metric tons of CO2 equivalent). CO2 emission is chosen as proxy for environmental pollution since it is the most commonly used proxy in the literature (Chen et al , 2018; Huynh, 2020; Aluko and Obalade, 2020; Akinlo and Dada, 2021). Presently, CO2 is the most “popular” source of pollution and greenhouse gas in developing countries which is one of the major concerns of environmentalists and policymakers (Dhrifi et al , 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three indicators are carbon dioxide (CO2) per capita (measured in parts-per-million, ppm), methane emissions (kt of CO2 equivalent) and nitrous oxide emissions (thousand metric tons of CO2 equivalent). CO2 emission is chosen as proxy for environmental pollution since it is the most commonly used proxy in the literature (Chen et al , 2018; Huynh, 2020; Aluko and Obalade, 2020; Akinlo and Dada, 2021). Presently, CO2 is the most “popular” source of pollution and greenhouse gas in developing countries which is one of the major concerns of environmentalists and policymakers (Dhrifi et al , 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mixed results generated criticisms that the EKC framework failed to consider other structural, institutional, and macroeconomic variables that tend to influence the environment. Furthermore, recent studies have incorporated structural, institutional, and macroeconomic variables in testing the EKC hypothesis using CO 2 emission, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulphur dioxide, industrial waste, water pollution, threatened species, and deforestation to measure environmental degradation (Kubicova, 2014; Opoku and Boachie, 2020; Dada and Ajide, 2021; Akinlo and Dada, 2021; Dada and Akinlo, 2021). Nevertheless, these proxies only capture part of the environmental pollution; that is they do not represent the entire human activities on the environment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, most studies in the environment literature measure environmental quality using CO 2 emission (Akinlo and Dada, 2021; Dada et al , 2021a, b; Huynh and Ho, 2020; Hanif, 2018). This measure is limited and weak in measuring environmental quality since it only measures air contamination and not total human activities on the environment (Usman and Hammar, 2021; Usman et al , 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that electricity usage increases environmental degradation, which is in line with (Lawson, 2020) and (Kwakwa, 2021 In terms of other variables, like foreign direct investment, the outcomes obtained from Table 4 demonstrate that FDI has a negative effect on CO 2 emissions but is statistically inconsequential in the short and long run, which is consistent with recent outcomes of (Acheampong et al, 2019). This nding contradicts the outcomes of (Akinlo & Dada, 2021), who discovered that FDI raises carbon emissions in Sub-Saharan Africa(SSA). Several different scenarios explain these outcomes.…”
Section: Outcomes Of Dynamic Stimulated Ardl Simulationmentioning
confidence: 58%