2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The modelling of an electromagnetic energy harvesting architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the proper term should be the "pseudo-magnetic levitation". However, in many papers, one can find the term magnetic levitation (maglev) [10,[25][26][27] instead of pseudo-magnetic levitation. The pseudo-maglev levitation harvesters are characterized by simplicity of their construction, lack of springs and dampers (not a physical spring that is easily worn out), therefore the time period of usage can be a very long.…”
Section: Pseudo-magnetic Levitation Harvestersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the proper term should be the "pseudo-magnetic levitation". However, in many papers, one can find the term magnetic levitation (maglev) [10,[25][26][27] instead of pseudo-magnetic levitation. The pseudo-maglev levitation harvesters are characterized by simplicity of their construction, lack of springs and dampers (not a physical spring that is easily worn out), therefore the time period of usage can be a very long.…”
Section: Pseudo-magnetic Levitation Harvestersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the Finite Element Method has been used to solve the differential equations that govern the dynamics of these systems. Then the magnetic forces, magnetic field distributions are usually easy modelled [25,28]. Mann and Sims [26] presented a design for electromagnetic energy harvesting from the nonlinear oscillations of magnetic levitation.…”
Section: Pseudo-magnetic Levitation Harvestersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, intelligent control algorithms can be developed to control the position of their components according to the excitations’ characteristics (for example, amplitude and frequency). Geometric optimization prior to fabrication and adaptive positional control of components cannot be accomplished using linear system models because they are not sufficient to adequately predict levitation-based energy harvesting, as such systems exhibit highly nonlinear behavior 20 21 . The Finite Element Method (FEM) has been used to solve the differential equations that govern the dynamics of these systems, taking into account effects such as the magnetic levitation forces between magnets and magnetic field (MF) distributions, etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Finite Element Method (FEM) has been used to solve the differential equations that govern the dynamics of these systems, taking into account effects such as the magnetic levitation forces between magnets and magnetic field (MF) distributions, etc. 21 22 23 24 . A combined approach using FEM and analytical or semi-analytical modeling has also been proposed 22 24 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%