2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018ms001521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Modeling of the North Equatorial Countercurrent in the Community Earth System Model and its Oceanic Component

Abstract: The North Equatorial Countercurrent (NECC) simulated by a coupled ocean-atmosphere model and its oceanic component have been investigated and compared against oceanographic observations. Coupled model simulations using the Community Earth System Model version 2 are compared against ocean-ice simulations forced by the second phase of the Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments (CORE) data set. The modeled circulation biases behave differently to the west of and to the east of 120°W: the CORE-forced ocean mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the 10-m wind product from a scatterometer represents the wind relative to the oceanic currents, using this wind with a bulk formula and a parameterization based on prescribed coupling coefficients (n in Figure 11) would, therefore, have a realistic eddy killing effect; however, the large-scale effect might be doubly accounted for, weakening the mean circulation. This has been recently shown to be important by Sun et al (2019) for the North Equatorial Countercurrent. To overcome this issue, one could filter out the CFB imprint (as in f in 11) by using the parameterization based on a predicted s and observed surface currents, for example, from AVISO (k in Figure 11).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Because the 10-m wind product from a scatterometer represents the wind relative to the oceanic currents, using this wind with a bulk formula and a parameterization based on prescribed coupling coefficients (n in Figure 11) would, therefore, have a realistic eddy killing effect; however, the large-scale effect might be doubly accounted for, weakening the mean circulation. This has been recently shown to be important by Sun et al (2019) for the North Equatorial Countercurrent. To overcome this issue, one could filter out the CFB imprint (as in f in 11) by using the parameterization based on a predicted s and observed surface currents, for example, from AVISO (k in Figure 11).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Rather it is due to a weak south equatorial counter current north of the equator and a weak equatorial counter current (not shown). This is at least partly attributed to deficiencies in the representation of wind stress curl in the JRA-55do forcing product (Sun et al 2019). These errors in forcing result in a weak meridional shear north of the equator which in turn leads to reduced instability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface ocean current is strongly determined and dominated by wind pattern distributions, as has been proposed for developing simulation models in previous NECC investigations [31,32]. Therefore, we plotted the average of the zonal component anomalies of wind stress extracted from wind data from 1993 to 2017 (Figure 7).…”
Section: Wind Forcingmentioning
confidence: 99%