1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02914354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The modeling of retained austenite in low-alloyed TRIP steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the first observations of the TRIP effect in metastable austenitic steels [14,15], a large volume of modelling [5-6, 10, 11, 16-18] and experimental work [5,15,16,18,19] has been aimed at understanding the mechanism. During the austenite to martensite transformation, the macroscopic plastic strain, arises from the shape change as determined by the preferential selection of favourable crystallographic variants (Magee effect [9]) and from the plastic accommodation processes which occur around the forming martensite grains (the Greenwood-Johnson effect) [6,12,16,19].…”
Section: Transformation-induced Plasticity Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the first observations of the TRIP effect in metastable austenitic steels [14,15], a large volume of modelling [5-6, 10, 11, 16-18] and experimental work [5,15,16,18,19] has been aimed at understanding the mechanism. During the austenite to martensite transformation, the macroscopic plastic strain, arises from the shape change as determined by the preferential selection of favourable crystallographic variants (Magee effect [9]) and from the plastic accommodation processes which occur around the forming martensite grains (the Greenwood-Johnson effect) [6,12,16,19].…”
Section: Transformation-induced Plasticity Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just as a fast rate of transformation of the RA with low C content ( <0.6 wt %) during plastic straining does not contribute to an increase in elongation [18], a much higher C content (>1.8 wt .%) results in the incomplete transformation of the RA to martensite and also does not lead to an increase in elongation [33]. In a steel with an average C content of 1.8 % [58], the operation of twinning in austenite has been noted at a strain of 0.17.…”
Section: Overall Chemical Composition and Carbon Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the RA is subject to both chemical and mechanical stabilization. [27,56,57] In order for transformation to martensite to take place under the load, the size of the RA should be sufficient for the martensite nuclei to form and its carbon content should be an intermediate one. If the carbon content is too low, then the RA will transform very quickly on initial loading and will not contribute significantly to the work hardening and ability of the steel to withstand the load.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Mechanical Behavior Of Nanobainitic Steelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As various processing schedules result in different microstructures, the focus of many research projects has been on increasing the volume fraction of the RA and its stability during straining [7,9,10]. Chemical (carbon content) and mechanical (size and morphology) stability of the RA are both important parameters that need to be controlled in order to achieve the desired strength-ductility balance in TRIP steels [7,[10][11][12][13][14]. In the present study, the correlation of the mechanical properties with the behaviour of the RA during tensile testing in thermo-mechanically processed TRIP steels is carried out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%