2002
DOI: 10.1541/ieejfms.122.715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Modeling of Lead-Acid Battery by Frequency-Response Characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, it adopts an equivalent circuit model with two positive-and negative-side capacitances, as in Figure 2(a), in order to express all battery capacitance components; however, there is no difference between the series connection of the two parallel connected RC circuits in Figure 2(a) and the single equivalent parallel connected RC circuit in Figure 2(b) (Buller et al, 2005;Conway, 1999;Kim, 2006;Lee et al, 2002;Yusivar et al, 2002). Instead, the doubling of the calculated equivalent single capacitance is the total capacitance based on the stored energy in the battery because the two series connected capacitances are presented as a single equivalent capacitance.…”
Section: Employed Battery Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Generally, it adopts an equivalent circuit model with two positive-and negative-side capacitances, as in Figure 2(a), in order to express all battery capacitance components; however, there is no difference between the series connection of the two parallel connected RC circuits in Figure 2(a) and the single equivalent parallel connected RC circuit in Figure 2(b) (Buller et al, 2005;Conway, 1999;Kim, 2006;Lee et al, 2002;Yusivar et al, 2002). Instead, the doubling of the calculated equivalent single capacitance is the total capacitance based on the stored energy in the battery because the two series connected capacitances are presented as a single equivalent capacitance.…”
Section: Employed Battery Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a one hour standstill, the frequency response of the battery was measured. The current response to voltage input was measured in order to maintain the SOC, which is different from measuring the voltage response to current input in the existing papers (Chen and Rincon-Mora, 2006;Kim, 2006;Yusivar et al, 2002). This is because the SOC is changed with the polarization voltage; in other words, the electromagnetic force (emf) of the battery is changed by charging and discharging even though an accurate sine wave or pulse with offset is applied to current input, and because the precise detection of output voltage is difficult as the OCV of the battery is irregular and includes noise.…”
Section: Frequency Response Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations