2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-012-1855-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mode of inheritance in tetraploid cut roses

Abstract: Tetraploid hybrid tea roses (Rosa hybrida) represent most of the commercial cultivars of cut roses and form the basis for breeding programmes. Due to intensive interspecific hybridizations, modern cut roses are complex tetraploids for which the mode of inheritance is not exactly known. The segregation patterns of molecular markers in a tetraploid mapping population of 184 genotypes, an F1 progeny from a cross of two heterozygous parents, were investigated for disomic and tetrasomic inheritance. The possible oc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
71
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
9
71
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact has already been reported (Qu and Hancock 2001;Koning-Boucoiran et al 2012) and forms the basis for a test of preferential pairing that we also exploit in this study. It is evident that preferential pairing can have a severe impact on the correct assignment of repulsion phase ( Figure 7A) regardless of whether MINR or MLL is used for phase assignment (data not shown).…”
Section: Effect Of Preferential Pairing On Mapping Of Simplex Markerssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This fact has already been reported (Qu and Hancock 2001;Koning-Boucoiran et al 2012) and forms the basis for a test of preferential pairing that we also exploit in this study. It is evident that preferential pairing can have a severe impact on the correct assignment of repulsion phase ( Figure 7A) regardless of whether MINR or MLL is used for phase assignment (data not shown).…”
Section: Effect Of Preferential Pairing On Mapping Of Simplex Markerssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This fact has already been reported (Qu and Hancock, 2001;Koning-Boucoiran et al, 2012) and forms the basis for a test of preferential pairing which we also exploit in this study. It is evident that preferential pairing can have a severe impact on the correct assignment of repulsion phase (Figure 7.a), regardless of whether MINR or MLL is used for phase-assignment (data not shown).…”
Section: Effect Of Preferential Pairing On Mapping Of Simplex Markerssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Of some concern are polyploid species for which the mode of inheritance is neither strictly polysomic nor disomic, but something in between. There have been various reports of "segmental allopolyploidy" (Stebbins, 1947;Sybenga, 1996), for example in rose (Koning-Boucoiran et al, 2012), garden dahlia (Schie et al, 2014) and peanut (Leal-Bertioli et al, 2015). One of the advantages of our approach is that it predominantly relies on coupling-phase estimates which have been shown to be more robust against preferential pairing than repulsion-phase estimates (the case of SxN markers is covered in detail in ).…”
Section: Application To Other Tetraploid Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations