1998
DOI: 10.1177/106907279800600107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MMPI-2 and Vocational Assessment: A Brief Report

Abstract: A review of the brief literature concerning the utilization of the MMPI-2 in vocational assessment is presented. Particular areas of focus include personnel selection, malingering, and applications with military personnel. Conclusions and implications are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Norris (2001) studied the elevated profile of validity scores in the MMPI-2 based on demographic data, and found that education was the most significant influence on increasing F scores, while age and marital conditions had less of an influence upon F scores. By contrast, another piece of research involving 1,156 military personnel indicated that age was one of the most important factors, and that youth scored higher than adults in most scales (Westefeld & Maples, 1998). However, our research revealed completely different results for the impact of demographic factors: the three factors (residence, age and education) did have more or less effect on the F score, but all the influences combined explained only 6.2% of variance of the F score, which demonstrated that the influence of these three factors upon the F scale could be ignored.…”
Section: New Infrequency Scalesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Norris (2001) studied the elevated profile of validity scores in the MMPI-2 based on demographic data, and found that education was the most significant influence on increasing F scores, while age and marital conditions had less of an influence upon F scores. By contrast, another piece of research involving 1,156 military personnel indicated that age was one of the most important factors, and that youth scored higher than adults in most scales (Westefeld & Maples, 1998). However, our research revealed completely different results for the impact of demographic factors: the three factors (residence, age and education) did have more or less effect on the F score, but all the influences combined explained only 6.2% of variance of the F score, which demonstrated that the influence of these three factors upon the F scale could be ignored.…”
Section: New Infrequency Scalesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…lowman (1989) provdes useful nformaton regardng some of the dfficultes and concerns when conductng pre-employment screenng for psychopathology, focusng manly on the occupaton of nuclear power plant workers . Westefeld and Maples (1998) reported on matchng applcants, mostly n polce departments, on the bass of the MMPI-2 to successful occupatonal ncumbents .…”
Section: Noticementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been used in clinical applications, as well as a screening instrument in personnel selection and job application contexts for decades (Butcher, Morfitt, Rouse, & Holden, 1997; Kornfeld, 1995). It has also been used to screen military job applicants who are applying for duty in special operations, for positions requiring access to sensitive information, and for other jobs that may represent significant risk or high visibility (Staal, Cigrang, & Fiedler, 2000; Westefeld & Maples, 1998). In the early 1990s, MMPI-2 was also introduced and adopted as a personnel selection tool for duty in special operations within the Chinese military.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%