2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-08041-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mitochondrial genomes of Tortricidae: nucleotide composition, gene variation and phylogenetic performance

Abstract: Background Mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) have greatly improved our understanding of the backbone phylogeny of Lepidoptera, but few studies on comparative mitogenomics below the family level have been conducted. Here, we generated 13 mitogenomes of eight tortricid species, reannotated 27 previously reported mitogenomes, and systematically performed a comparative analysis of nucleotide composition, gene variation and phylogenetic performance. Results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the problem associated with the phylogenetic relationships among Enarmoniini and three other tribes of Olethreutinae was evident. According to the BI tree, the phylogenetic relationships among the tribes in Olethreutinae can be inferred as: Enarmoniini + (Olethreutini + [Eucosmini + Grapholitini]), which is consistent with the results given by Yang et al (2021), whereas the ML tree showed that phylogenetic relationships are (Enarmoniini + Olethreutini) + (Eucosmini + Grapholitini). These two trees according to the analysis of nucleotide sequences are different from the findings of Regier et al (2012), where the tribes group as Olethreutini + (Enarmoniini + [Eucosmini + Grapholitini]).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, the problem associated with the phylogenetic relationships among Enarmoniini and three other tribes of Olethreutinae was evident. According to the BI tree, the phylogenetic relationships among the tribes in Olethreutinae can be inferred as: Enarmoniini + (Olethreutini + [Eucosmini + Grapholitini]), which is consistent with the results given by Yang et al (2021), whereas the ML tree showed that phylogenetic relationships are (Enarmoniini + Olethreutini) + (Eucosmini + Grapholitini). These two trees according to the analysis of nucleotide sequences are different from the findings of Regier et al (2012), where the tribes group as Olethreutini + (Enarmoniini + [Eucosmini + Grapholitini]).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The circumscription of tortricid tribes has been proposed primarily on the basis of adult morphology and larval biology (Horak & Brown, 1991; Horak, 1998, 2006; Kuznetsov & Stekolnikov, 1977, 1984; Powell, 1964; Razowski, 1976). The monophyly of most tribes is corroborated by molecular phylogeny; however, the relationship among the tribes in each subfamily has not been explicitly determined; the phylogenetic positions and compositions of several tribes have remained controversial, such as the taxonomic status of Polyorthini within Chlidanotinae; that of Cochylini and Epitymbiini within Tortricinae; that of Gatesclarkeanini, Endotheniini, and Bactrini within Olethreutinae; the phylogenetic positions of Phricanthini and Schoenotenini within Tortricinae; and the monophyly of Olethreutini within Olethreutinae (Fagua et al, 2016; Horak 2006; Regier et al, 2012; Safonkin, 2007; Yang et al, 2021). To understand the evolution of Tortricidae, further research involving a wide range of taxa is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the tree based on PCGAA dataset showed a similar topology with that of PCG12R and PCG12 datasets. These results overall indicate that the third coding positions of 13 PCGs contain high phylogenetic informativeness although they may have experienced some substitution saturation (Yang et al, 2021 ). Regardless of the Pseudobistonidae with no mitogenome available, the close relationship between Epicopeiidae and Sematuridae is recovered by multilocus data in previous molecular studies (Rajaei et al, 2015 ; Wang et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As a result, they integrated gene sequences into a “supermatrix” to boost phylogenetic signal and node support. However, simultaneous analysis of linked gene sequences should be treated with caution, as biases can interfere with phylogenetic inferences due to strongly supportive clades erroneously grouped based on multiple substitution artifacts (e.g., heterogeneity of nucleotide composition [ 259 , 260 ], change in speed at different sites [ 261 , 262 ] and an increase in the sample of taxa [ 254 , 255 , 263 , 264 ].…”
Section: Phylogenetic Characteristics Of Salmonmentioning
confidence: 99%