2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2799213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mitigating Effect of Bank Financing on Shareholder Value and Firm Policies Following Rating Downgrades

Abstract: To cite this version:Mascia Bedendo, Linus Siming. The mitigating effect of bank financing on shareholder value and firm policies following rating downgrades. Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, 2018Elsevier, , 48, pp.94 -108. 10.1016Elsevier, /j.jcorpfin.2017 The mitigating effect of bank financing on shareholder value and firm policies following rating downgrades AbstractWe document that shareholders of high-yield firms are less sensitive to credit rating downgrades the higher the proportion of bank … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Kisgen (2006, 2009) finds that firms reduce leverage before anticipated or after real rating downgrades and this behavior is more pronounced for firms around the investment–speculative grade cutoff. Chernenko and Sunderam (2012) show that irrespective of firms’ credit quality, a “discrete change in label” from investment to speculative grade is negatively related to capital expenditures, whereas Bedendo and Siming (2018) show that after rating downgrades, firms reduce capital expenditures. Alissa and colleagues (2013) and Brown and colleagues (2015) investigate whether firms use earnings management policies to influence credit ratings, and find that firms around the investment–speculative grade threshold use more aggressive earnings’ management than other firms.…”
Section: Theory and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Kisgen (2006, 2009) finds that firms reduce leverage before anticipated or after real rating downgrades and this behavior is more pronounced for firms around the investment–speculative grade cutoff. Chernenko and Sunderam (2012) show that irrespective of firms’ credit quality, a “discrete change in label” from investment to speculative grade is negatively related to capital expenditures, whereas Bedendo and Siming (2018) show that after rating downgrades, firms reduce capital expenditures. Alissa and colleagues (2013) and Brown and colleagues (2015) investigate whether firms use earnings management policies to influence credit ratings, and find that firms around the investment–speculative grade threshold use more aggressive earnings’ management than other firms.…”
Section: Theory and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we are interested in firms' CSR engagement policies as a response to focal credit rating changes and in the ex post effects these policies may have for credit ratings. The credit ratings literature suggests that firms adjust corporate policies (capital structure, investment, and accounting practices) to maintain or improve credit ratings (Agha & Faff, 2014;Alissa et al, 2013;Bedendo & Siming, 2018;Brown et al, 2015;Chernenko & Sunderam, 2012;Jung et al, 2013;Kisgen, 2006Kisgen, , 2007Kisgen, , 2009.…”
Section: Csr and Investment-speculative Grade Crossoversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a measure of default risk, firm rating is a common proxy of the financial constraints (Bedendo and Siming, 2018). We set a numerical score of 26 for AAA rated bonds and 1 for bonds receiving a rating of D.…”
Section: Regression Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%