Abstract:The drivers of eco-innovation (EI) have been the focus of much research in the past. Some of these drivers have been external to the firm, such as regulation, whereas others have been internal, including its resources and capabilities and its environmental strategy. However, the analysis of the impact of those drivers on EI has too often been carried out as if they were separated from each other. In reality, the EI drivers are likely to interact. This paper tries to cover this gap in the literature using a hol… Show more
“…As to the policy implications of this study, firstly, the results provide confidence to policy makers regarding the positive effect that the policies that promote eco-innovation can have on business competitiveness and, secondly, offer some guidelines that could assist them to establish incentives for developing eco-innovation. Indeed, a better understanding of the drivers of eco-innovation could assist policy makers to develop policies aimed at promoting eco-innovation (Keshminder and Río 2019;Costa 2021), for example, stimulating or, at least, not limiting the accumulation of power in the figure of the CEO. Moreover, considering this paper's results, policy makers could develop policies aimed at raising managerial awareness regarding the environmental and economic benefits that eco-innovation projects can generate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the resource-based theory (Keshminder and Río 2019), larger and more profitable firms have a greater volume of resources that can be devoted to eco-innovation projects Przychodzen and Przychodzen 2015). Likewise, firm age also favors eco-innovation, as older companies have accumulated knowledge and experience related to the development of other environmental strategies (Rehfeld et al 2007) and often have greater access to external financing (Johnson and Lybecker 2012).…”
Section: Models and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, eco-innovation has attracted growing research attention (de Jesus Pacheco et al 2018) with the aim of knowing its characteristics and drivers (Díaz-García et al 2015). However, most studies have focused on examining the institutional and market factors as well as the firm characteristics that lead companies to pursue eco-innovation (Keshminder and Río 2019), whereas researchers have paid relatively little attention to the role played by the chief executive officer (CEO) in this regard (Liao et al 2019), despite being the main actor responsible for corporate strategies, including those related to corporate social responsibility (CSR) (Arena et al 2018;García-Sánchez and Martínez-Ferrero 2019;García-Sánchez et al 2020c). Indeed, only a small number of papers have analyzed how the CEO's characteristics may affect her/his company's propensity to develop eco-innovation.…”
Using data from a sample of 4863 international firms corresponding to the period 2002–2017, this paper examines the role that chief executive officer (CEO) power plays in environmental innovation and the impact that these strategies have on financial performance. Both issues have been the subject of considerable debate in the literature, with opposite views and contradictory findings. The results indicate that investing in environmental innovations related to the use of clean technologies, ecological production processes, and the design, manufacture and commercialization of environmentally sustainable products requires that CEOs have a greater degree of power in order to support projects that do not entail a higher return in the short and medium terms. Additionally, the results show that the negative economic effect of eco-innovation reverses in the fourth and fifth years after environmental innovations were implemented. Thus, this study supports the view regarding a “bright side” of CEO power with regard to corporate sustainability.
“…As to the policy implications of this study, firstly, the results provide confidence to policy makers regarding the positive effect that the policies that promote eco-innovation can have on business competitiveness and, secondly, offer some guidelines that could assist them to establish incentives for developing eco-innovation. Indeed, a better understanding of the drivers of eco-innovation could assist policy makers to develop policies aimed at promoting eco-innovation (Keshminder and Río 2019;Costa 2021), for example, stimulating or, at least, not limiting the accumulation of power in the figure of the CEO. Moreover, considering this paper's results, policy makers could develop policies aimed at raising managerial awareness regarding the environmental and economic benefits that eco-innovation projects can generate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the resource-based theory (Keshminder and Río 2019), larger and more profitable firms have a greater volume of resources that can be devoted to eco-innovation projects Przychodzen and Przychodzen 2015). Likewise, firm age also favors eco-innovation, as older companies have accumulated knowledge and experience related to the development of other environmental strategies (Rehfeld et al 2007) and often have greater access to external financing (Johnson and Lybecker 2012).…”
Section: Models and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, eco-innovation has attracted growing research attention (de Jesus Pacheco et al 2018) with the aim of knowing its characteristics and drivers (Díaz-García et al 2015). However, most studies have focused on examining the institutional and market factors as well as the firm characteristics that lead companies to pursue eco-innovation (Keshminder and Río 2019), whereas researchers have paid relatively little attention to the role played by the chief executive officer (CEO) in this regard (Liao et al 2019), despite being the main actor responsible for corporate strategies, including those related to corporate social responsibility (CSR) (Arena et al 2018;García-Sánchez and Martínez-Ferrero 2019;García-Sánchez et al 2020c). Indeed, only a small number of papers have analyzed how the CEO's characteristics may affect her/his company's propensity to develop eco-innovation.…”
Using data from a sample of 4863 international firms corresponding to the period 2002–2017, this paper examines the role that chief executive officer (CEO) power plays in environmental innovation and the impact that these strategies have on financial performance. Both issues have been the subject of considerable debate in the literature, with opposite views and contradictory findings. The results indicate that investing in environmental innovations related to the use of clean technologies, ecological production processes, and the design, manufacture and commercialization of environmentally sustainable products requires that CEOs have a greater degree of power in order to support projects that do not entail a higher return in the short and medium terms. Additionally, the results show that the negative economic effect of eco-innovation reverses in the fourth and fifth years after environmental innovations were implemented. Thus, this study supports the view regarding a “bright side” of CEO power with regard to corporate sustainability.
“…Reduced resources and capacities can lead companies to cooperate to obtain the means to deal with the complexity of proactive environmental strategies (De Marchi, 2012). In a later study, Keshminder and Pablo del Río (2019) highlight the role that institutional factors can play directly and indirectly in business environmental proactivity.…”
Eco‐innovation and eco‐design strategies are associated with firms' innovation capabilities. Moreover, they may impact on access to public subsidies and on financial performance. In this respect, the agri‐food industry is especially vulnerable, because in general, this sector has less experience of technological innovation, and managers are more likely to be averse to such projects. On the other hand, the board may promote a proactive environmental approach to defend the interests of investors and other stakeholders, taking the view that these strategies reduce the environmental impact of the firm's products and its production processes and are therefore beneficial. Our study aim is to identify the profile of directors who may be favourable to eco‐design and eco‐innovation strategies, focusing on the traits of independence, gender diversity and environmental specialisation. The results obtained, from a dependence model based on panel data supplied by 321 agri‐food companies for the period 2002–2017 (unbalanced panel data with 4878 observations), show that independent directors play a crucial role in implementing eco‐innovation and eco‐design projects. However, neither the diversity nor the specialisation of directors is a significant factor in this regard.
“…The paper by Keshminder & del Río () provides an initial attempt to cover an important yet neglected topic in the research of drivers of eco‐innovation, that is, whether and how those drivers are interrelated instead of being only separated from each other. A holistic and integrated approach to eco‐innovation drivers is designed by the authors, merging different streams of the literature.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.