2022
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.add9320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The missing link between zeolites and polyoxometalates

Abstract: Open framework materials such as zeolites and metalorganic frameworks are garnering tremendous interest because of their intriguing architecture and attractive functionalities. Thus, new types of open framework materials are highly sought after. Here, we present the discovery of completely new inorganic framework materials, where, in contrast to conventional inorganic open frameworks, the scaffold is not based on tetrahedral EO 4 (E = main group element) but octahedral MO 6 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 For example, in the case of the Anderson−Evans POM, which is formed by a plane of seven edge-sharing Mo-oxo octahedra (Figure 1a) and the central M site, within a ring of six MoO 6 octahedra, can be substituted by other transition metals, including Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Rh, and Pt, to enable different catalytic reactions. 7−9 Recent efforts toward POM-based catalysis have dispersed them on high surface area supports, 10,11 such as porous silica and metal−organic frameworks (MOFs), 12,13 to enhance accessibility to the POM relative to the bulk. Here, the versatile tunability of MOF pore geometries and chemical environments 14 Zr.HVCDAMXLLUJLQZ.MOFkey-v1.csq) can exhibit higher catalytic reactivity than either component alone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 For example, in the case of the Anderson−Evans POM, which is formed by a plane of seven edge-sharing Mo-oxo octahedra (Figure 1a) and the central M site, within a ring of six MoO 6 octahedra, can be substituted by other transition metals, including Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Rh, and Pt, to enable different catalytic reactions. 7−9 Recent efforts toward POM-based catalysis have dispersed them on high surface area supports, 10,11 such as porous silica and metal−organic frameworks (MOFs), 12,13 to enhance accessibility to the POM relative to the bulk. Here, the versatile tunability of MOF pore geometries and chemical environments 14 Zr.HVCDAMXLLUJLQZ.MOFkey-v1.csq) can exhibit higher catalytic reactivity than either component alone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent efforts toward POM-based catalysis have dispersed them on high surface area supports, , such as porous silica and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), , to enhance accessibility to the POM relative to the bulk. Here, the versatile tunability of MOF pore geometries and chemical environments combined with the versatility of POMs allows for both a high level of control over the SSC structure and chemistry and also an unmatched opportunity to explore how these govern catalysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%