1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1059-1311(05)80010-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The misdiagnosis of epilepsy: findings of a population study

Abstract: This paper reports the results of a population study designed to assess the standards of epilepsy care within a geographical population in relation to diagnosis, seizure management and quality of life. One of the findings was the unexpectedly high frequency of the misdiagnosis of epilepsy. Forty-nine of 214 patients with a primary diagnosis of epilepsy were subsequently found to have been misdiagnosed following a specialist review and investigations. All except two have been withdrawn from antiepileptic medica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
129
0
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
129
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, 13% of all referrals to a Canadian tertiary adult epilepsy clinic were diagnosed with NCS. This number is consistent with those reported in population studies 14,15 or specialist clinics. 7 Some of our patients carried a diagnosis of epilepsy for over ten years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In total, 13% of all referrals to a Canadian tertiary adult epilepsy clinic were diagnosed with NCS. This number is consistent with those reported in population studies 14,15 or specialist clinics. 7 Some of our patients carried a diagnosis of epilepsy for over ten years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…While the visible manifestations of epileptic and nonepileptic seizures overlap to a considerable extent, their underlying causes are very different: epileptic seizures are caused by abnormal electrical activity in the brain, while NES are a response to psychological distress and represent a failure of alternative coping mechanisms (Reuber et al 2005). The differentiation of epilepsy and NES disorders is a major challenge: despite technological advances, rates of misdiagnosis remain high -up to 50% in some studies (Howell et al 1989;Scheepers et al 1998;Benbadis et al 2004). This situation is alarming since the most appropriate treatments for epilepsy and NES are very different: most epileptic seizures can be controlled with anti-epileptic drugs, whereas the treatment of choice for NES is psychotherapy (Reuber et al 2005).…”
Section: Listening To People With Seizuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is well-known that the rate of misdiagnosis of epilepsy is quite high. In fact, a population based study in adults found a misdi-agnosis rate of 23% (Scheepers et al, 1998) and 26% of patients referred for "refractory epilepsy" were found not to have epilepsy at all (Smith et al, 1999). In children, the problem of misdiagnosis is even more relevant as a prospective study of more than 300 patients referred to a dedicated secondary care clinic showed that only 23% of children were given a final diagnosis of epilepsy (Hindley et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%