2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The (mis)estimation of neighborhood effects: causal inference for a practicable social epidemiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
458
1
9

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 613 publications
(476 citation statements)
references
References 200 publications
4
458
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…14,15 In addition to low power, one of the major limitations of our analysis is that we were unable to determine how much of the association we observed between neighborhood poverty and sexual network position was due to context as opposed Odds ratios are from logistic regression models with robust standard errors assuming clustering within CBGs but not between (Stata logistic, cluster () option) to composition. 25 Our a priori hypothesis was that while individual-level income may affect network position, it is living in a neighborhood characterized by poverty that is most important, due to contextual pathways through the sex ratio and norms about sexual behaviors. However, distinguishing between these two hypotheses requires individual-level measures of income, which were not available in our dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 In addition to low power, one of the major limitations of our analysis is that we were unable to determine how much of the association we observed between neighborhood poverty and sexual network position was due to context as opposed Odds ratios are from logistic regression models with robust standard errors assuming clustering within CBGs but not between (Stata logistic, cluster () option) to composition. 25 Our a priori hypothesis was that while individual-level income may affect network position, it is living in a neighborhood characterized by poverty that is most important, due to contextual pathways through the sex ratio and norms about sexual behaviors. However, distinguishing between these two hypotheses requires individual-level measures of income, which were not available in our dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this subject is a challenge in all observational epidemiology (Hernan & Robins, 2006) the analysis of contextual causal effects on health presents specific difficulties (Merlo & Chaix, 2006;Oakes JM, 2003) CONCLUSIONS Our analyses demonstrate that the interpretation of specific and general contextual effects in multilevel analyses need to be be performed simultaneously. Otherwise specific contextual effects may lead to misleading conclusions.…”
Section: Specific Contextual Effects: On the Association Between Contmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A third limitation in this study as in nearly all neighborhood effects studies [71,72] is residential self-selection-the tendency for people to choose neighborhoods that better support their chosen lifestyles. For example, because disorder can act as a barrier to walking only for subjects who would ever choose to walk, if those subjects on average choose less disordered neighborhoods, then an estimated effect of disorder failing to account for this difference in walking preferences would be biased.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%