2004
DOI: 10.1093/eic/54.3.260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mirror and the Lamp

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the history of Western literature, the creative process itself becomes, from the nineteenth century onwards, both more and less appealing as an object of study. The critical commonplace in literary studies is that the Romantic movement establishes the creative process as a transcendental, ineffable moment, associating it more than ever before with notions such as inspiration, genius, originality (Abrams 1953; Hoffpauir 1985; Perry 2005; for discussions of aspects of the psychology of Romanticism, see Woodman 2005; Clark 1997). This idealisation privileges creativity as an object of wonder yet paradoxically produces a lacuna of knowability in its place; it simultaneously offers up creativity and inspiration as worthy of analysis while obfuscating it as ultimately incomprehensible.…”
Section: Disciplinary Dialoguesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the history of Western literature, the creative process itself becomes, from the nineteenth century onwards, both more and less appealing as an object of study. The critical commonplace in literary studies is that the Romantic movement establishes the creative process as a transcendental, ineffable moment, associating it more than ever before with notions such as inspiration, genius, originality (Abrams 1953; Hoffpauir 1985; Perry 2005; for discussions of aspects of the psychology of Romanticism, see Woodman 2005; Clark 1997). This idealisation privileges creativity as an object of wonder yet paradoxically produces a lacuna of knowability in its place; it simultaneously offers up creativity and inspiration as worthy of analysis while obfuscating it as ultimately incomprehensible.…”
Section: Disciplinary Dialoguesmentioning
confidence: 99%