2000
DOI: 10.1177/0730888400027001005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ministry as an Occupational Labor Market

Abstract: Attachment to one's employer is not the same as attachment to one's occupation (profession), but little theory or research exist to explain why the two are different. The authors integrate arguments about market viability of occupational labor markets from Bridges and Villemez and arguments about professional values from Wallace in offering the hypothesis that attachment to one's employer is based primarily on economic rationality, whereas attachment to one's occupation (profession) is determined more by adher… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social comparisons (with others or self) affect wants, aspirations, and judgments of what is feasible for oneself (Major, 1994), and when social comparison leads to feelings of unfairness, the individual may intend to leave the firm. As pointed out by McDuff and Mueller (2000), clergy intentions to leave one church for another are based on a rational assessment of work conditions in their current church. Thus, we predict that despite their professional service calling, clergy will seriously consider leaving their organization if they are experiencing gender discrimination and unfairness in their church.…”
Section: Direct Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social comparisons (with others or self) affect wants, aspirations, and judgments of what is feasible for oneself (Major, 1994), and when social comparison leads to feelings of unfairness, the individual may intend to leave the firm. As pointed out by McDuff and Mueller (2000), clergy intentions to leave one church for another are based on a rational assessment of work conditions in their current church. Thus, we predict that despite their professional service calling, clergy will seriously consider leaving their organization if they are experiencing gender discrimination and unfairness in their church.…”
Section: Direct Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first glance, the difference between someone claiming to be called to work with a group or on a particular project as opposed to a person being called by a group or organization might seem semantic, but the differences are real and significant. Although other researchers (McDuff and Mueller 2000;Wildhagen, Mueller, and Wang 2005) have clearly demonstrated that the notion of religious calling as the sole or even primary determinant that is taken into account when religious professionals are deciding which jobs to take is more myth than reality, this does not diminish the notion of a calling as an important feature of religious organizations. Institutional theorists have long demonstrated the important role that organizational myths and ceremonies have in determining organizational structure and how powerful they can be at ushering institutionalization (Meyer and Rowan 1977).…”
Section: Resisting Institutionalization 19mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The pastoral job position has similarities with what is labelled secondary labor markets (SLAMs). McDuff and Mueller (2000) point to the fact that pastors' wages are generally low, there is no significant investment by employers, entry requirements are fairly general, there are no mechanisms promoting firm-specific tenure (i.e., there is little job security with a particular church), turnover is expected, and there is no potential for promotion within a particular church. All these factors naturally do not promote a secure employment but rather gives the impression that the pastor is easily expendable (turnover is expected) as pastors come easy without any significant costs and are easily disposed of only to be replaced with the next candidate on the same terms (Rosendahl, 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Framementioning
confidence: 99%