2011
DOI: 10.1080/19488300.2011.609522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The minimump-envy location problem: a new model for equitable distribution of emergency resources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(), Chanta et al. () proposed the minimum p ‐envy location model, relaxing the strict and ordinal preference assumptions made originally in Espejo et al. (), and including backup servers.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(), Chanta et al. () proposed the minimum p ‐envy location model, relaxing the strict and ordinal preference assumptions made originally in Espejo et al. (), and including backup servers.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Espejo et al (2009) introduced the envy criteria, which measures the difference between pairs of customers (thus, is a measure of equity). Based on Espejo et al (2009), Chanta et al (2011 proposed the minimum p-envy location model, relaxing the strict and ordinal preference assumptions made originally in Espejo et al (2009), and including backup servers. Most of the equity considerations in location problems have been devoted to reducing disparities among customers, but they are not the only players in the system.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies that consider equity as an objective areChanta et al (2011) (determining locations of ambulance dispatch facilities for equitable access by demand zones);Meng and Yang (2002) (optimizing road network expansion for equitable benefits received by people);Mazumdar et al (1991) (equitable assignment of performance in a multiuser telecommunications network);Wang et al (2007) (equitable water rights allocation between countries); andVossen et al (2003) (equitable allocation of national air space) Marsh and Schilling (1994). focus on the equity objective for facility location problems, defining equity as the case where -each group receives its fair-share of the effect of the facility siting decisions.‖…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore they are close to reality when systems have all advanced life support vehicles (ALS) and treat all real emergency calls equally (which is often the case). Furthermore, allowing for multiple vehicles at stations does not tend to increase coverage, and when it does, may result in inequitable (from the point of the customer) solutions, Chanta et al [30], and McLay et al [31]. We also assume that there is a zero-length patient queue.…”
Section: Ems System With Nested-compliance Policymentioning
confidence: 97%