2015
DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1107137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Minimum Clinically Important Difference in the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status

Abstract: We estimated the MCID for the total scale score, language, immediate memory, delayed memory, visuospatial/constructional, and attention indexes of the RBANS as 8, 9, 10, 10, 6, and 4 points, respectively. These estimates are best suited to discriminate between patient groups, for example, in a clinical trial setting. Further research is needed using longitudinal data to assess their applicability to assess within patient differences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard methods for detecting a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in neurocognitive scores and other quality of life assessments typically suggest that changes exceeding 0.5 SD (i.e., 7.5 points for an IQ score) or 2 standard errors of measurement (SEM; typically around 3–6 points for index scores on the Wechsler scales) constitute a meaningful difference. 20 , 21 Applying the criterion of 0.5 SD for the MCID at the group level, observed declines from baseline to 2 years post-transplant could be considered clinically meaningful for the LS group in 4 neurocognitive domains: visual reasoning, processing speed, fine motor dexterity, and visual–motor integration. In contrast, no declines meeting this threshold were observed in the VLS group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard methods for detecting a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in neurocognitive scores and other quality of life assessments typically suggest that changes exceeding 0.5 SD (i.e., 7.5 points for an IQ score) or 2 standard errors of measurement (SEM; typically around 3–6 points for index scores on the Wechsler scales) constitute a meaningful difference. 20 , 21 Applying the criterion of 0.5 SD for the MCID at the group level, observed declines from baseline to 2 years post-transplant could be considered clinically meaningful for the LS group in 4 neurocognitive domains: visual reasoning, processing speed, fine motor dexterity, and visual–motor integration. In contrast, no declines meeting this threshold were observed in the VLS group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous research studies have been conducted regarding the ability of the measure to identify cognitive change in individuals with normal cognition (Andreotti & Hawkins, 2015; Cooley et al, 2015; Duff & Ramezani, 2015; Phillips et al, 2015; Thaler, Hill, Duff, Mold, & Scott, 2015), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI; Clark, Hobson, & O’Bryant, 2010; Duff, Hobson, Beglinger, & O’Bryant, 2010; Hobson, Hall, Humphreys-Clark, Schrimsher, & O’Bryant, 2010; Karantzoulis, Novitski, Gold, & Randolph, 2013; O’Mahar et al, 2012), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD; Burton, Enright, O’Connell, Lanting, & Morgan, 2015; Duff et al, 2008; Enright, O’Connell, MacKinnon, & Morgan, 2015; Heyanka, Scott, & Adams, 2015; McDermott & DeFilippis, 2010; Morgan, Linck, Scott, Adams, & Mold, 2010; Schmitt et al, 2010). Despite these efforts, however, there have been few studies examining the RBANS and its association with imaging biomarkers related to AD, such as decreased hippocampal volumes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; Choi et al, 2016; Jack et al, 2010), hypometabolism on fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET; Frings, Spehl, Hull, & Meyer, 2016; Jagust et al, 2010), and amyloid accumulations on amyloid PET (Beach, Thal, Zanette, Smith, & Buckley, 2016; L.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for 1- s.e.m. of the MCID in cognition for mild cognitive impairment (Phillips et al ., 2015 ). In this study, anchor-based MCID in cognition ranged from 0.3 to 0.9.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MCID also plays a crucial role in interpreting cognitive and functional scale scores in a clinical setting. Until now, interpreting results from such instruments have relied on the personal experience of clinicians treating populations with BD and thus lack objectivity (Phillips et al ., 2015 ). The MCID has been proposed as a more objective way to establish clinical relevance to changes in standardised instrument scores and can be used to assess the effectiveness of treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%