2008
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0812.5004
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The minimal two DM components with SUSY

Ji-Haeng Huh,
Jihn E. Kim,
Bumseok Kyae

Abstract: We present the dark matter extension of the minimal supersymmetric standard model by one more stable fermion N toward explaining the recent rising high energy positron spectrum of the PAMELA data. The needed coupling can arise in the flipped-SU(5) GUT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most popular DM candidate is the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) in the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM). The MSSM LSP has been proposed to explain the e ± excesses [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] However the MSSM also has problem. The LSP is a linear combination of photino, zino and higgsino.…”
Section: Theoretical Models For Dark Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most popular DM candidate is the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) in the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM). The MSSM LSP has been proposed to explain the e ± excesses [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] However the MSSM also has problem. The LSP is a linear combination of photino, zino and higgsino.…”
Section: Theoretical Models For Dark Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although astrophysics calculations of background e ± spectrum in our galaxy have errors due to model parameters [3][4][5][6], within reasonable ranges it is not possible to eliminate the excesses in the energy range from 10 GeV to 1 TeV. The e ± excesses in cosmic ray have generated much excitement in particle physics community because dark matter (DM), which contributes about 23% energy density of our universe with properties different than those of the standard model (SM) particles, can provide a nature explanation [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] [25] [26][27][28][29][30] [ [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] [ [49][50][51] [ [52][53][54] [ [ [79][80]...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many dark matter models, the dark matter particles are their own anti-particles (Majorana fermions), and can annihilate with each other. There are several possible DM annihilation scenarios: (i) DM particles annihilate to standard model particle pairs, such as gauge bosons, quarks, and lepton pairs 138,141,202,203,204,205 ; (ii) DM particles annihilate via virtual internal bremsstrahlung processes to produce e + e − γ 206 ; (iii) DM particles annihilate to new mediating particle pairs, which then decay to e + e − and other standard model particles 207,208,209 212,138,213,141,27,207,214,215,216,217,218,206,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,…”
Section: Dark Matter Models For the E ± Excessmentioning
confidence: 99%