2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00029-016-0288-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The minimal length of a Lagrangian cobordism between Legendrians

Abstract: Abstract. To investigate the rigidity and flexibility of Lagrangian cobordisms between Legendrian submanifolds, we investigate the minimal length of such a cobordism, which is a 1-dimensional measurement of the non-cylindrical portion of the cobordism. Our primary tool is a set of real-valued capacities for a Legendrian submanifold, which are derived from a filtered version of Legendrian Contact Homology. Relationships between capacities of Legendrians at the ends of a Lagrangian cobordism yield lower bounds o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Legendrian knots in contact 3-manifolds are instrumental to study the contact geometry of 3-manifolds [6,20,21,22,24,25,32]. The classification of Legendrian knots and their Lagrangian fillings has been one of the central areas of research in low-dimensional contact topology [17,18,36,47,49,50,51]. The only Legendrian knot for which there exist a complete non-empty classification of Lagrangian fillings is the Legendrian unknot [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legendrian knots in contact 3-manifolds are instrumental to study the contact geometry of 3-manifolds [6,20,21,22,24,25,32]. The classification of Legendrian knots and their Lagrangian fillings has been one of the central areas of research in low-dimensional contact topology [17,18,36,47,49,50,51]. The only Legendrian knot for which there exist a complete non-empty classification of Lagrangian fillings is the Legendrian unknot [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results related to Corollary 1.9. Sabloff and Traynor prove a similar result when the Legendrian contact homology DGAs have augmentations [47], which in turned inspired this corollary. Their hypotheses are stronger as many Legendrian contact homology DGAs do not have augmentations.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…They are now a wellestablished technique for studying quantitative questions in symplectic topology. They have also been defined for Legendrian submanifolds in certain contact manifolds by Zapolsky in [52], and Sabloff-Traynor considered some of their properties under Lagrangian cobordisms in their work [46]. Here we study further properties that are satisfied under Lagrangian cobordisms and positive isotopies which will be used when proving Theorem 1.8.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 92%