2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2009.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The minimal degree for a class of finite complex reflection groups

Abstract: We calculate the minimal faithful permutation degree for a class of finite complex reflection groups G(p, p, q), for p and q primes, and demonstrate that they form examples where the minimal degree of a direct product is strictly less than the sum of the minimal degrees of the direct factors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that there are pairs of groups G and H such that µ(G × H) < µ(G) + µ(H). For examples, see [2] or [3]. It should be also noted that in [2], after proving the formula for nilpotent groups, the same formula is proved for an extended collection of groups, each containing a "large enough" nilpotent subgroup.…”
Section: Definition 6 (Central Socle Groups) the Collection Cs Is Def...mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It should be noted that there are pairs of groups G and H such that µ(G × H) < µ(G) + µ(H). For examples, see [2] or [3]. It should be also noted that in [2], after proving the formula for nilpotent groups, the same formula is proved for an extended collection of groups, each containing a "large enough" nilpotent subgroup.…”
Section: Definition 6 (Central Socle Groups) the Collection Cs Is Def...mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Here, the group G could be taken to be G (2,2,5) and H to be the centraliser of G in Sym (10) which is cyclic of order 2. Moreover in [8,9], the author studied the minimal degrees of the complex reflection groups G(p, p, q), where p and q are primes and constructed an infinite class of examples where strict inequality holds (see Section 8 for a full definition of this family of groups). It was always the case that for G = G(p, p, q), where p and q are distinct primes satisfying certain other conditions, we have µ(G) = µ(G × C Sym(µ(G)) (G))…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , G l }, where l ≥ 1 and the G i are the point stabilisers of the orbits of G, we may express µ(G) as the smallest value of l i=1 |G : G i | such that the intersection of the cores of the G i is trivial; recall core(G i ) = g∈G G g i (see [4], [9]). It is common to call a collection of subgroups which furnishes µ(G) the minimal representation (though it may not in general be unique).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that example, G and H generate a subgroup GH of Sym(15) that is an internal direct product of G and H. Saunders showed in [6] that the example in [8] fits into a general family that provides infinitely many instances of strict inequality in (1). There G could be taken to be the complex reflection group G(p, p, q), where p and q are distinct odd primes satisfying certain other conditions, and H the centraliser of the minimally embedded image of G in Sym(pq).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%