2021
DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2021.1943800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The minimal clinically important difference in Berg Balance Scale scores among patients with early subacute stroke: a multicenter, retrospective, observational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant results ( p = 1.00; mean difference = −0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −3.24, 3.26) (see Figure 4 a). Considering the estimated minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the BBS score for individuals with subacute stroke [ 33 ], the results of this quantitative analysis did not reveal any considerable clinical improvement worthwhile for the sample as the lower limit in the effect size was lower than the MCID. Lastly, the I 2 value was equal to 0% for heterogeneity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant results ( p = 1.00; mean difference = −0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −3.24, 3.26) (see Figure 4 a). Considering the estimated minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the BBS score for individuals with subacute stroke [ 33 ], the results of this quantitative analysis did not reveal any considerable clinical improvement worthwhile for the sample as the lower limit in the effect size was lower than the MCID. Lastly, the I 2 value was equal to 0% for heterogeneity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting that, in both studies, in addition to ADL enhancement, significant improvements in balance were also reported. Further investigations are needed to assess if a direct relationship between balance and ADL improvements due to o-RAGT is present in the stroke population [ 33 ]. The meta-analysis was conducted on three out of four RCTs that were focused on ADL evaluation, of which only one reported a significant change due to the EksoGT device plus CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum clinically important differences (MCID) of each outcome measurement was considered to be as follows: 0.16 m/s in walking speed ( 44 ), 5 points in the BBS ( 45 ), 9.25% (1.85/20 points) in the BI ( 46 ), and 22 points in the FIM ( 47 ). In addition, changes in the TCT above the cut-off score of 40 was considered clinically meaningful ( 40 ), and an improvement of at least 1 point in the FAC was considered to be clinically meaningful ( 45 ). Based on the above considerations, the improvements in each outcome were as follows: those in functional mobility were reported in 10 of 15 cases, with improvements in the FAC in 6 cases ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BBS scale was used to evaluate balance function through 14 items, which ask the subject to maintain a specific position, to carry out specific motor tasks and postural transitions [21]. A significant difference (six points) between total BBS score in T1 and T10, higher than values of minimal clinically significant difference cited in literature, emerged at final evaluation [22,23]. An increase of single scores of BBS items was pointed out in:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%