1972
DOI: 10.1037/h0034060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The minicourse as a vehicle for changing teacher behavior: A three-year follow-up.

Abstract: A 3-year follow-up of teachers trained in. Minicourse 1 was reported. Videotape recordings of each of 24 experimental teachers were made before, immediately after, 4 months after, and 39 months after training. These recordings were analyzed to compare the level of teacher performance on each specific skill covered in Minicourse 1 at each of four checkpoints. An analysis of variance revealed that on the postcourse evaluation the subjects were significantly above their precourse level on all 10 behaviors. Compar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
2

Year Published

1973
1973
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some training courses assign a key role to observation lists that provide an overview of the specific target behaviors as they can guide participants during the actual VF sessions (Borg et al 1970;Fuller and Manning 1973;Hargie et al 1983;Huhra et al 2008). Borg and his colleagues (Borg 1972;Borg et al 1970) were presumably the first researchers who combined instruction, modeling, practice, and video feedback with a structured evaluation form. Their "minicourses", which were at that time "probably the most comprehensive development of microteaching for in-service training" according to Cooper and Allen (1970: 8), are therefore characterized by a coherent instructional sequence.…”
Section: Variations Of Video Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some training courses assign a key role to observation lists that provide an overview of the specific target behaviors as they can guide participants during the actual VF sessions (Borg et al 1970;Fuller and Manning 1973;Hargie et al 1983;Huhra et al 2008). Borg and his colleagues (Borg 1972;Borg et al 1970) were presumably the first researchers who combined instruction, modeling, practice, and video feedback with a structured evaluation form. Their "minicourses", which were at that time "probably the most comprehensive development of microteaching for in-service training" according to Cooper and Allen (1970: 8), are therefore characterized by a coherent instructional sequence.…”
Section: Variations Of Video Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The use of video in teacher education was introduced in Western countries like the United States in 1960. Since then, a variety of video-based programs have been popular, from micro-teaching sessions (Borg, 1972) to the programs that involve the latest multimedia (Lampert & Ball, 1998). At first, the recording of video in the classroom was only used by substitute teachers for evaluations (Olivero, 1965).…”
Section: Lesson Study and Video Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of interest that even very anxious first year students were not handicapped by concurrent assessment of teaching and were, if anything better when assessed in a test lesson. The experiment also clarifies the fact that (pace Borg, 1972), academic knowledge about teaching can improve classroom performance in areas such as setting objectives, structuring and selecting materials. On the other hand, in areas such as focusing, guiding and involving, personal feedback from videotape gives greater success.…”
Section: Results Ii: Lesson Assessment Scoresmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…What teachers get out of such courses is academic knowledge about teaching" (Borg, 1972). It was also intended to overcome the difficulty that "teaching practice is largely haphazard and unstructured, and is not an adequate preparation for subsequent teaching" (Tansey, 1969).…”
Section: Knowledge and Know-howmentioning
confidence: 99%