2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The millimeter-wavelength sulfur dioxide absorption spectra measured under simulated Venus conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For SO 2 and OCS, we use data for broadening by CO 2 available in HITRAN (Wilzewski et al 2016;Gordon et al 2017). Although the SO 2 broadening data are derived from a single line experiment (Chandra & Chandra 1963), the parameters in the frequencies of interest are consistent with recent laboratory results by Bellotti & Steffes (2015). The broadening values for our SO 2 lines of interest are approximately 1.8-2.0× air broadening (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…For SO 2 and OCS, we use data for broadening by CO 2 available in HITRAN (Wilzewski et al 2016;Gordon et al 2017). Although the SO 2 broadening data are derived from a single line experiment (Chandra & Chandra 1963), the parameters in the frequencies of interest are consistent with recent laboratory results by Bellotti & Steffes (2015). The broadening values for our SO 2 lines of interest are approximately 1.8-2.0× air broadening (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Venus is a terrestrial planet with a dense atmosphere. Assuming that the Venusian atmosphere is planar stratified and has N vertical layers, the brightness temperature (TB) measured by a spaceborne downward‐looking radiometer can be expressed as follows (Bellotti & Steffes, 2015): TB=ej=1NτjTsϵ+Tc(1ϵ)e2j=1Nτj+i=1NTi()1eτiej=i+1Nτj+i=1NTi(1ϵ)()1eτiej=1i1τjej=1Nτj $TB={{\mathrm{e}}^{\left(-\sum \nolimits_{j=1}^{N}{\tau }_{j}\right)}T}_{s}{\epsilon}+{T}_{c}(1-{\epsilon}){\mathrm{e}}^{\left(-2\sum \nolimits_{j=1}^{N}{\tau }_{j}\right)}+\sum\limits _{i=1}^{N}{T}_{i}\left(1-{\mathrm{e}}^{-{\tau }_{i}}\right){\mathrm{e}}^{\left(-\sum \nolimits_{j=i+1}^{N}{\tau }_{j}\right)}+\sum\limits _{i=1}^{N}{T}_{i}(1-{\epsilon})\left(1-{\mathrm{e}}^{-{\tau }_{i}}\right){\mathrm{e}}^{\left(-\sum \nolimits_{j=1}^{i-1}{\tau }_{j}\right)}{\mathrm{e}}^{\left(-\sum \nolimits_{j=1}^{N}{\tau }_{j}\right)}$ where i indicates the i th layer of the atmosphere ( i = 1 for surface), ϵ represents the surface emissivity, e denotes the natural constant, T s represents the surface physical temperature in Kelvin, T c represents the cosmic background radiation temperature (2.7 K), T i represents the physical temperature of the i th layer in Kelvin, and τ i represents the optical depth of the i th layer in Np and can be calculated as follows: τi=s()z=zis...…”
Section: Retrieval Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Venus is a terrestrial planet with a dense atmosphere. Assuming that the Venusian atmosphere is planar stratified and has N vertical layers, the brightness temperature (TB) measured by a spaceborne downward-looking radiometer can be expressed as follows (Bellotti & Steffes, 2015):…”
Section: Rt Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extract reference flux densities, for Venus we use the model that gives brightness temperature as a function of frequency that has been discussed in [23] (see figure 38 of that paper), and which was obtained from a fit of the literature data to a power law: 𝑇 Venus B (𝜈) = 1047.1 × (𝜈/GHz) −0.25 K. This model gives Venus' brightness temperature after subtraction of the CMB monopole, so it can then be directly compared with the data, which in practice also have the CMB monopole subtracted, so it is totally absorbed by the planet disc. This model gives slightly higher temperatures than physical models in the literature [46,47]. However, we prefer to stick to this phenomenological fit as it provides a better description of the observed data.…”
Section: Planetsmentioning
confidence: 98%