2015
DOI: 10.5787/43-1-1107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Military, War and Society: The Need for Critical Sociological Engagement

Abstract: Sociology offers a distinctive way of seeing and explaining the social world within which we live, as well as the events and institutions that shape it. Given this, it is surprising that the study of war by sociologists has been largely at the margins of the discipline. This has not always been the case, if one reflects on the work of the founding fathers of sociology -Marx, Weber and Durkheim. While the 'sociology of war' still does not feature strongly within the discipline, this article shows that sociology… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Weber's ideal types construction was chosen because we consider his methodology relevant for a case study, significant historical event, potential for comparability and applicability for the complexity (Ragin & Zaret, 1983;Psathas, 2005). Besides that, Weber analyzed the influence of war and military on the state, which means he was engaged in this context (Heinecken, 2015) and only few sociologists have been writing about war. But, it must be mentioned that in contrast to Weber, our ideal types were constructed empirically out of the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weber's ideal types construction was chosen because we consider his methodology relevant for a case study, significant historical event, potential for comparability and applicability for the complexity (Ragin & Zaret, 1983;Psathas, 2005). Besides that, Weber analyzed the influence of war and military on the state, which means he was engaged in this context (Heinecken, 2015) and only few sociologists have been writing about war. But, it must be mentioned that in contrast to Weber, our ideal types were constructed empirically out of the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodology. The theoretical basis of our research is different conceptions and methods for studying MI of service(wo)men/veterans 4 [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], as well as theories of service(wo)men/veterans" transition from the civilian environment to the military environment, and vice versa [3; 14-21]. The most known methods for measuring MI are the Warrior Identity Scale by S. Lancaster, S. Kinchle, S. Castro [8; 9] and the Military Professional Identity Scale for measuring modifications of MI (idealism, professionalism, warriorism, and individualism) by R. Johansen, D. Laberg, & M. Martinusen [1; 7].…”
Section: ключовіmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the comparatively low levels of social capital in Ukraine, the recent experience of civically organized and well-spread voluntarily services during the ongoing military conflict, constitute a quite unique and interesting event. Despite the fact that social capital has been utilized in numerous studies within many research fields, there is a lack of knowledge on how social capital develops and changes in periods of societal crises and how this in turn may influence mental health of population (Carlson, 2016;Eriksson & Emmelin, 2016;Heinecken, 2015). This study aims to fill this gap.…”
Section: The Role Of Social Support In Times Of Military Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social capital is believed to foster peace, facilitate institutional and interpersonal trust and support, as well as safety and security, and may thus become an important resource in times of military conflict. But at the same time it can become a negative tool to facilitate development of the military conflict (Cox, 2008;Deng, 2010;Heinecken, 2015).…”
Section: The Role Of Social Support In Times Of Military Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%