1973
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90576-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The middle temporal visual area (MT) in the bushbaby,Galago senegalensis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
71
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
8
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1D). Defined by imaging, the size of MT (18 mm 2 with a rostrocaudal length of 4.1 mm and a dorsoventral height of 6.3 mm) corresponds with previous portrayals of MT in bush babies (11,12) and with the size of MT judged from histological boundaries in the present cases (Fig. 1D).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1D). Defined by imaging, the size of MT (18 mm 2 with a rostrocaudal length of 4.1 mm and a dorsoventral height of 6.3 mm) corresponds with previous portrayals of MT in bush babies (11,12) and with the size of MT judged from histological boundaries in the present cases (Fig. 1D).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In contrast, the red band corresponds to the zero horizontal activation zone, effectively dividing MT into dorsal and ventral halves. The Ϫ8°horizontal window shifted the band of activation (blue) into the dorsal half of MT, as predicted by microelectrode studies of retinotopy (11). However, the retinotopy revealed by optical imaging was crude, with restricted stimuli activating large portions of MT and spatially adjacent stimuli activating largely overlapping regions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Single unit studies reported a consistent retinotopic organization in area MT in several primate species (Allman et al, 1973;Van Essen et al, 1981); however, it has been difficult to reveal retinotopy in human MTϩ. Instead, fMRI studies distinguished between presumptive areas MT versus MST in human MTϩ, on the basis of properties related to the classical contralateral retinotopy (Huk et al, 2002).…”
Section: Candidate Retinotopic Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the obvious laminar differences in myelination in V1 are now imaged almost routinely (Barbier et al, 2002). On the basis of histological studies, myelin-sensitive imaging could eventually distinguish subtler differences in areas V2 (Tootell et al, 1983;Rosa and Krubitzer, 1999), V3 (Burkhalter et al, 1986), V3A (Lewis and Van Essen, 2000), MT (Allman et al, 1973;Van Essen et al, 1981;Tootell et al, 1985), and LIP/VIP (Blatt et al, 1990) and specific parietal areas (Lewis and Van Essen, 2000). Sophisticated analysis of MR images can also reveal quantitative differences in cortical thickness (Fischl et al, 2002); some areas (e.g., V1) are thinner than surrounding areas.…”
Section: Mri Mapping Of Histological Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%