2013
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/776/1/7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mid-Infrared Extinction Law in the Large Magellanic Cloud

Abstract: Based on the photometric data from the Spitzer /SAGE survey and with red giants as the extinction tracers, the mid-infrared (MIR) extinction laws in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) are derived for the first time in the form of A λ /A K S , the extinction in the four IRAC bands (i.e., [3.6], [4.5], [5.8] and [8.0] µm) relative to the 2MASS K S band at 2.16 µm. We obtain the near-infrared (NIR) extinction coefficient to beExcept for the extinction in the IRAC [4.5] band which may be contaminated by the 4.6 µm C… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(134 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter is in excellent agreement with those listed in Table 6. As for the cluster distance moduli, we adopted the same distance modulus for all clusters (m − M) o = 18.49 ± 0.09 mag ) and Cardelli et al 1989;Gao et al 2013); by considering an average depth for the LMC disc of (3.44 ± 1.16) kpc (∆((m − M) o ) ∼ 0.15 mag Subramanian & Subramaniam 2009), we derived a smaller age difference than that resulting from the isochrones (characterised by the same metallicity) bracketing the observed cluster features in the CMD.…”
Section: Cluster Ages and Extinctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is in excellent agreement with those listed in Table 6. As for the cluster distance moduli, we adopted the same distance modulus for all clusters (m − M) o = 18.49 ± 0.09 mag ) and Cardelli et al 1989;Gao et al 2013); by considering an average depth for the LMC disc of (3.44 ± 1.16) kpc (∆((m − M) o ) ∼ 0.15 mag Subramanian & Subramaniam 2009), we derived a smaller age difference than that resulting from the isochrones (characterised by the same metallicity) bracketing the observed cluster features in the CMD.…”
Section: Cluster Ages and Extinctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 and 5). The reddening values were converted using the following equations: E(V −J)=1.80E(V −I); E(V −Ks)=2.24E(V −I) E(J−Ks)=0.43E(V −I) (Cardelli, Clayton, & Mathis 1989;Gao et al 2013). 7 The coefficients of the P W relations were calculated in a similar way.…”
Section: J Ks-band Period-luminosity Period-luminosity-colour and Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopted the same distance modulus for all clusters (m − M )0 = 18.49 ± 0.09 mag (de Grijs, Wicker & Bono 2014) and Ks − MK s = (m − M )0 + 0.372E(B − V ), for RV = 3.1 (Cardelli, Clayton & Mathis 1989;Gao et al 2013), since by considering an average depth for the LMC disc of (3.44±1.16) kpc ), we derived a smaller age difference than that resulting from the isochrones (characterized by the same metallicity) bracketing the observed cluster features in the CMD.…”
Section: Star Cluster Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%