2013
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.12196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mid‐domain effect: it's not just about space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding agrees with the strong correlations documented between environmental gradients and global patterns in diversity, especially effects of water, energy, or geographic regimes Hawkins and Porter 2003;Qian 2008;Ricklefs et al 2004;Whittaker et al 2008). Therefore, the controversy about the mid-domain effect is far from resolved (Colwell et al 2009;Letten et al 2013;Wang et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This finding agrees with the strong correlations documented between environmental gradients and global patterns in diversity, especially effects of water, energy, or geographic regimes Hawkins and Porter 2003;Qian 2008;Ricklefs et al 2004;Whittaker et al 2008). Therefore, the controversy about the mid-domain effect is far from resolved (Colwell et al 2009;Letten et al 2013;Wang et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Figure 1a offers a physical analogy (a pencil-box) for this phenomenon, which later became known as the mid-domain effect (Colwell & Lees 2000) or MDE, because, in a simple 1-dimensional domain, the expected distribution of species richness under this model is exactly symmetrical about the centre of the domain. Geometric constraints have been generalised to other bounded spatial (Storch et al 2006) and non-spatial (Letten et al 2013) domains at the assemblage level, as well as to studies of home ranges (Prevedello et al 2013) and the movement of individuals within a population (Tiwari et al 2005). The classic geometric constraint model illustrated by a physical analogy: a set of pencils (species), some shorter and some longer (narrower and wider elevational ranges), stored in a schoolchild's old-fashioned pencil-box (the bounded elevational domain) (Colwell et al 2004).…”
Section: Geometric Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and non‐spatial (Letten et al . ) domains at the assemblage level, as well as to studies of home ranges (Prevedello et al . ) and the movement of individuals within a population (Tiwari et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Schnitzer & Carson , Stevens & Carson , Letten et al . ). The resulting lottery of colonization by these pioneer species may make propagule pressure particularly important in tropical rain forest pioneer tree communities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disturbance in the form of treefalls creates gaps for pioneer species, including small, light-demanding trees that quickly colonize these spaces (Denslow 1987). Although there is some evidence for niche differentiation as a function of gap size, pioneer tree assemblages are largely shaped by chance arrival at a gap, rather than competitive outcomes tracking slight differences in abiotic conditions (Hubbell et al 1999, Schnitzer & Carson 2001, Stevens & Carson 2002, Letten et al 2013. The resulting lottery of colonization by these pioneer species may make propagule pressure particularly important in tropical rain forest pioneer tree communities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%