1982
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(82)90418-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The microstructure of neutron irradiated type-348 stainless steel and its relation to creep and hardening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of several crystallographic variants of G-phase observed in this work is in good agreement with the results obtained by Thomas et al [15]. The predominance of this phase in SA 316 compared to CW 316 is also reported by Maziasz [37].…”
Section: Intragranular Precipitatessupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of several crystallographic variants of G-phase observed in this work is in good agreement with the results obtained by Thomas et al [15]. The predominance of this phase in SA 316 compared to CW 316 is also reported by Maziasz [37].…”
Section: Intragranular Precipitatessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Its lattice parameter measured from lattice images is estimated to be 11.64 Å [5]. This value is similar to those reported in the literature [5,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. c 0 precipitates are smaller and more numerous than s/g carbides and G-particles.…”
Section: Dislocation Linesmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Since swelling is very sensitive to irradiation conditions, such as temperature and dose rate, swelling data are very scarce in PWR-relevant low-doserate, low-temperature conditions (10 −10 -10 −8 dpa/s, >20 dpa, 300-370 • C). Figure 29 shows the swelling data from PWR-irradiated SSs and MTR-irradiated SSs at LWR-relevant temperatures [218,[340][341][342][343][344][345][346][347]. The data show different trends in swelling evolution with morphology (bubble vs. void), reactor type (PWR vs. FBR) and materials (304 vs. others).…”
Section: Other Related Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cavities formed in the present materials are thought to be fine helium bubbles since the morphology, size and density were quite similar to those reported as helium bubbles. [21][22][23] These were identified in all the irradiation conditions whereas no void was observed. The difference of 30 K (565 vs. 595 K in samples C vs. D and G vs. H) in similar dose and dose rate condition caused no notable changes in cavity morphology.…”
Section: Cavitiesmentioning
confidence: 89%