2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6115-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The microbiota structure in the cecum of laying hens contributes to dissimilar H2S production

Abstract: BackgroundHost genotype plays a crucial role in microbial composition of laying hens, which may lead to dissimilar odor gas production. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship among layer breed, microbial structure and odor production.ResultsThirty Hy-Line Gray and thirty Lohmann Pink laying hens were used in this study to determine the impact of cecal microbial structure on odor production of laying hens. The hens were managed under the same husbandry and dietary regimes. Results of in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous study, we found a signi cantly higher daily H 2 S production in Lohmann laying hens than Hy-line Gray laying hens (the daily H 2 S production per kg average daily feed intake was 7.75 and 4.17 mg for Lohmann and Hy-line, respectively) [26]. However, whether the H 2 S emission difference between the two breeds of laying hens was due to host miRNA regulation of the gut microbiota requires further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our previous study, we found a signi cantly higher daily H 2 S production in Lohmann laying hens than Hy-line Gray laying hens (the daily H 2 S production per kg average daily feed intake was 7.75 and 4.17 mg for Lohmann and Hy-line, respectively) [26]. However, whether the H 2 S emission difference between the two breeds of laying hens was due to host miRNA regulation of the gut microbiota requires further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In a previous study, we found that Hy-line hens exhibited lower H 2 S production than Lohmann hens as a result of different microbiota structures related to H 2 S production in the cecum [26]. However, due to the limitation of 16S rRNA sequencing, we did not annotate and identify pathways and genes related to bacterial sulfur metabolism.…”
Section: Differential Expression Of Cecal Microbial Genes Led To Dissmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our previous study, we found a signi cantly higher daily H 2 S production in Lohmann laying hens than Hy-line Gray laying hens (the daily H 2 S production per kg average daily feed intake was 7.75 and 4.17 mg for Lohmann and Hy-line, respectively) [29]. However, whether the H 2 S emission difference between the two breeds of laying hens was due to host miRNA regulation of the gut microbiota requires further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…3A). As above mentioned that gga-miR-222a and gga-miR-10a-5p were both high expression level miRNAs in Hy-line and Lohmann, however, the abundance of gga-miR-222a was signi cantly higher in Hy-line by the comparison of Lohmann, and the abundance of gga-miR-10a-5p was signi cantly lower in Hy-lin by the comparison of Lohmann, in addition, our previous study showed that the amount of H 2 S production was obviously higher in Lohmann by the comparison of Hy-line (the daily H 2 S production per kg average daily feed intake was 7.75 and 4.17 mg for Lohmann and Hy-line, respectively) [29], thus we concluded that gga-miR-222a was the potential additive candidate for the reduction of H 2 S production in the cecum of laying hens, it was much worth to select gga-miR-222a for the further investigation rather than the selection of gga-miR-10a-5p. We found that gga-miR-222a could target two genes that associated with methionine synthase, Odosp_3416 (expressed by the bacterium Odoribacter splanchnicus) and BF9343_2953 (expressed by the bacterium Bacteroides fragilis NCTC 9343) ( Fig.…”
Section: Target Prediction Of Mirnasmentioning
confidence: 81%