2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2006.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The micro-mechanics of cortical shell removal in the human vertebral body

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
47
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A voxel size of 60 μm was chosen based on a detailed convergence study (Appendix A) which showed that the error associated with the 60-μm model was minimal for the outcome variable of interest in this study. An averaging technique [11,12] was used within an image processing software (IDL, Research Systems Inc., Boulder, CO) to identify the cortical shell and cortical endplates. Since it was difficult to clearly identify the transition from the endplate to the cortical shell, the bone tissue at the corner regions were also tagged with a unique identifier (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A voxel size of 60 μm was chosen based on a detailed convergence study (Appendix A) which showed that the error associated with the 60-μm model was minimal for the outcome variable of interest in this study. An averaging technique [11,12] was used within an image processing software (IDL, Research Systems Inc., Boulder, CO) to identify the cortical shell and cortical endplates. Since it was difficult to clearly identify the transition from the endplate to the cortical shell, the bone tissue at the corner regions were also tagged with a unique identifier (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While experiments [9] have shown that disc degeneration alters the loading conditions on the cortical endplates of the vertebral body, results from computational studies [10] suggest that the average effect of the altered loading conditions on vertebral strength may not be appreciable. High-resolution micro-CT based finite element modeling of whole vertebrae (40-60 micron voxel size) has enabled accurate characterization of the thin, porous shell and trabecular microarchitecture, and has helped resolve long-standing issues such as the substantial load-bearing role of the cortical shell [11,12]. Homminga et al [6] compared a single normal vertebra to an osteoporotic vertebra and found that the osteoporotic vertebra was less resistant to "error" loads developed due to forward flexion or lifting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, numerous attempts have been made to distinguish their relative contributions to vertebral strength. Such attempts have included physical separation of the cortical shell [4][5][6], and use of computational modeling to predict the contribution of the cortex to strength of the vertebral body [6][7][8][9]. In addition, there is a small, but growing, body of evidence describing the structure of the cortex per se, or in relation to osteoporotic fracture.…”
Section: The Cortical Shell In Vertebral Fragilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the cortex ranges from about 280 to 800 μm, the variation of which depends on the vertebral level [10][11][12][13], the anatomical location within the vertebra [10][11][12], and the method of determination, including histomorphometry [10][11][12][13], CT [6,14,15], and micro-CT [8,9]. By histomorphometry, the thickness of the anterior cortex of lumbar vertebrae is about 450 μm.…”
Section: The Cortical Shell In Vertebral Fragilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation