2012
DOI: 10.5692/clinicalneurol.52.1043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MG-QOL15 Japanese version: validation and associations with clinical factors

Abstract: We produced a Japanese translation of the 15-item myasthenia gravis (MG)-specific quality of life (QOL) scale (MG-QOL15), assessed its reliability and validity, and examined clinical factors affecting the self-perceived QOL in MG. Consecutive 327 patients with MG seen at six neurological centers were evaluated. All patients completed an MG-QOL15 Japanese version (MG-QOL15-J), the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II), and a generic health-related QOL questionnaire, the SF-36. Disease severity was d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
151
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
14
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because there is no MG‐specific measure of quality of life in Persian, we decided to evaluate the MG‐QOL15 validity and reliability in Iranian patients. The Persian MG‐QOL15 revealed acceptable internal consistency, test–retest reproducibility, and concurrent and construct validity, as in previous studies . The total MG‐QOL15 scores in our patients were lower than reported by Burns et al, and, furthermore, the correlation of each SF‐36 domain with the MG‐QOL15 was higher in our study in comparison with the results of previous studies .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Because there is no MG‐specific measure of quality of life in Persian, we decided to evaluate the MG‐QOL15 validity and reliability in Iranian patients. The Persian MG‐QOL15 revealed acceptable internal consistency, test–retest reproducibility, and concurrent and construct validity, as in previous studies . The total MG‐QOL15 scores in our patients were lower than reported by Burns et al, and, furthermore, the correlation of each SF‐36 domain with the MG‐QOL15 was higher in our study in comparison with the results of previous studies .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…more symptoms and incapacity attributed to the disease), the worse the perception of the general health status by the patient. This is in line with the results of the other two studies with the MG-QOL15 12,17 . Indeed the frequency and severity of MG symptoms are wellknown factors that influence the patient's perception of his/her quality of life 15,12 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Achievement of CSR is uncommon, even today, and the situation has not improved substantially since the 1940s . Rather than achievement of CSR, achievement of MM would be appropriate as a practical goal of MG therapy . Therefore, the patients in the PSL group were subdivided into 2 groups: the “MM or better” group, including CSR, PR, and MM; and the “I or worse” group, including I, U, W, and E. Comparisons between the 2 groups using the Mann‐Whitney U ‐test and the Pearson chi‐square test were conducted to identify factors associated with MM or better status.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%