Planning Metropolitan Australia 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315281377-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Metropolitan Condition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ushered in by market-led planning regimes and legitimized by entrenched urban compaction planning orthodoxies, this development presents challenges for these cities, for the governance of this new housing stock and for the residents who make their homes within it. At the urban scale, condoization risks a form of 'urban fracking' (Gleeson 2017b). In terms of the built environment, condoization may yield, at worst, thousands upon thousands of undifferentiated, poorly designed, constructed and performing homes crammed into vast towers that cluster to form inactive, windy and overshadowed streetscapes.…”
Section: The Workings Of Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ushered in by market-led planning regimes and legitimized by entrenched urban compaction planning orthodoxies, this development presents challenges for these cities, for the governance of this new housing stock and for the residents who make their homes within it. At the urban scale, condoization risks a form of 'urban fracking' (Gleeson 2017b). In terms of the built environment, condoization may yield, at worst, thousands upon thousands of undifferentiated, poorly designed, constructed and performing homes crammed into vast towers that cluster to form inactive, windy and overshadowed streetscapes.…”
Section: The Workings Of Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With urban policy increasingly defined by the structures, requirements and expectations of private finance, investment ambition rather than public policy has become the framework for determining physical outcomes (Buxton et al 2012, Gleeson 2018, Troy 2018. The impacts of this shift have stimulated debate both locally (Rogers 2016, Hulse andReynolds 2018) and globally (Moreno 2014, Aalbers 2016).…”
Section: Planning and The High-rise Revolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heeding calls from Graham and Marvin () about the negative impacts of privatisation and noting the impacts such privatisation may have on holistically and strategically planning for the future of Australian cities (Dodson, ), we think the ACCC's review is sobering. It signals in Australia such that the creation of private monopolies is unsettling how we know and understand neoliberalism (Gleeson, ). This change sparks many new questions, including those related to the ways in which planning for Australian cities is itself privatised and others about what impact might this have for participation.…”
Section: Neoliberalism and What Counts In The Public Spherementioning
confidence: 99%