1985
DOI: 10.2307/1971329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Metric Entropy of Diffeomorphisms: Part II: Relations between Entropy, Exponents and Dimension

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
378
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(389 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
378
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This yields (1) and (2). Part (3) is a direct consequence of (2) and the definition (35), in the case y ∈ W s ε (y). The general statement follows, using the invariance property (sh2): [43,Section 4] where stronger results are proved in detail using similar methods, in the context of linear cocycles.…”
Section: Continuity Of Holonomiesmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This yields (1) and (2). Part (3) is a direct consequence of (2) and the definition (35), in the case y ∈ W s ε (y). The general statement follows, using the invariance property (sh2): [43,Section 4] where stronger results are proved in detail using similar methods, in the context of linear cocycles.…”
Section: Continuity Of Holonomiesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…When the vectors in the center bundle E c also have non-zero Lyapunov exponents, that is, when lim 1 n log Df n (x)v = 0 ∀v ∈ E c x at typical points x ∈ M , one can build on (non-uniform) hyperbolicity theory to derive important geometric and statistical information on the dynamics. See Pesin [38,39], Ledrappier, Young [32,34,35], Katok [29], Barreira, Pesin, Schmeling [8], Young [45,46], and Alves, Bonatti, Viana [2,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, j), the conditional measures µ ij x are trivial. This is a (slight adaptation of a) special case of the "Ledrappier-Young entropy formula" [12,13] and is of great importance, for the Theorems 5.1 and 5.2 are not useful without a reasonable way to verify the conditions on µ ij x . The above result provides this, and, indeed, in many applications it is Theorem 4.3 rather than Theorem 5.2 which is directly applicable.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now let us briefly -and very heuristically -indicate how one might use Lemma 5.1. The assertion 5.1 says, in particular, that the value of x → µ 13 x is "the same" (at least, proportional) at x and at n 12 (t)x, except for a set of t of µ 12…”
Section: Lemma 51 (Product Lemma)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We call the expression vol µ (α m , H, x) volume decay entropy at x -it can be thought of as a combination of the dimension of µ H x at x and the contraction rates of θ m (see Ledrappier-Young's entropy formula [20]). In case P x is invariant under θ, mod(α m , P x ) is the negative logarithm of the module of the restriction of θ m to P x .…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%