1986
DOI: 10.1016/0165-0270(86)90116-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The metric analysis of three-dimensional dendritic tree patterns: a methodological review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
105
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although size has been shown to correlate with several other neuronal features, its discriminative power is very limited (a given volume can theoretically correspond to infinitely many different shapes). Also, it may be difficult in practice to estimate somatic size accurately, due to ambiguities in the transitions from soma to dendrites (31,89). To characterize somatic shape, important measures include the maximum diameter (major axis), the minimum diameter (minor axis), and especially their ratio.…”
Section: Soma Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although size has been shown to correlate with several other neuronal features, its discriminative power is very limited (a given volume can theoretically correspond to infinitely many different shapes). Also, it may be difficult in practice to estimate somatic size accurately, due to ambiguities in the transitions from soma to dendrites (31,89). To characterize somatic shape, important measures include the maximum diameter (major axis), the minimum diameter (minor axis), and especially their ratio.…”
Section: Soma Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative stereological procedures based on counting intersections with other patterns of test lines have also been proposed (93,94). Sholl analysis has been criticized because of its intermingling of topological and metrical parameters, its limited sensitivity (it will detect only relatively large structural differences between groups of neurons), and the fact that it completely ignores orientation differences (31,89).…”
Section: Tree Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimation of dendritic branching density. Because the Golgi analysis detected differences only in the branching pattern and length of the apical and not the basal dentritic trees, the branching density of the apical dendritic trees of CA3 pyramidal neurons of active, hibernating, and awaken hamsters (3 h) was evaluated by using a variation of the Sholl method (39,40). An acetate sheet containing a series of concentric circles calibrated at 20-m intervals was superimposed to each tracing so that the center of the circles coincided with the center of the cell body.…”
Section: Data Analysis Of Golgi Material Estimation Of Dendritic Bramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphological criteria employed for the selection of the neurons were similar to those described by De Ruiter and Uylings 26 : integrity and dark homogeneous impregnation throughout the extent of the dendrites, cell bodies located in the middle part of the section thickness to minimize the number of branch segments cut off at the plane of the section and relative isolation from other impregnated cells, blood vessels and silver deposits placed nearby. The existence of cut terminal segments on a neuron was not considered as a criterion for its exclusion from the estimations, because this type of elimination of neurons would have biased the sample toward smaller neurons 27 . Following these criteria, ten granule cells, eight CA3 pyramidal cells and eight CA1 pyramidal cells were selected from each case, both in the right and in the left hippocampal formations (Fig 2).…”
Section: Quantitative Study Of the Golgi-impregnated Dendritic Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%