1981
DOI: 10.3758/bf03206130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The meter of syncopated auditory polyrhythms

Abstract: Subjects tapped the perceived meter or beat of polyrhythms that consisted of two conflicting pulse trains (e.g., three elements/repetition vs. five elements/repetition). The meter interpretation was based on the global rhythmic properties of a polyrhythm as well as on the temporal properties of each pulse train. The rhythmic properties of a polyrhythm restricted the range of meter interpretations. Some polyrhythms were overdetermined and allowed but one meter, while others were more ambiguous and allowed sever… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
69
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
9
69
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike single-interval mechanisms being based on absolute duration, those additional mechanisms would use the presence of a regular beat as an alternative reference frame for the timing of intervals relative to the beat. Psychophysical data from previous studies in normals support a dissociation between mechanisms for duration-based as opposed to beat-based timing of intervals and rhythmic sequences (20,21,32,(34)(35)(36)(37)(38). The preservation of relative timing tasks is not consistent with the idea that the cerebellum provides a single mechanism subserving both single-interval and beat-based timing; rather, the data suggest one or more mechanisms of perceptual entrainment with a regular beat that are independent of single-interval timing and can occur despite cerebellar damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Unlike single-interval mechanisms being based on absolute duration, those additional mechanisms would use the presence of a regular beat as an alternative reference frame for the timing of intervals relative to the beat. Psychophysical data from previous studies in normals support a dissociation between mechanisms for duration-based as opposed to beat-based timing of intervals and rhythmic sequences (20,21,32,(34)(35)(36)(37)(38). The preservation of relative timing tasks is not consistent with the idea that the cerebellum provides a single mechanism subserving both single-interval and beat-based timing; rather, the data suggest one or more mechanisms of perceptual entrainment with a regular beat that are independent of single-interval timing and can occur despite cerebellar damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…can go on to establish metrical frameworks , but even those with complex ratios (e.g., 1:2.5, 1:3.5) can successfully form into groups and be processed with (admittedly lower) accuracy (Essens, 1986;Handel & Oshinsky, 1981), as well as learned implicitly (Schultz, Stevens, Keller, & Tillmann, 2013). Thus the sequence of durations in a rhythmic pattern has unique importance beyond its role in establishing a metre (Monahan, Kendall, & Carterette, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on rhythm perception using polyrhythms also offers some pointers on the influence of musical parameters. For example, in a study with polyrhythms combining two or three 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, and 7-element pulse trains, Handel and his colleagues found that participants' choice of temporal structure varied based on the relative amplitude (loudness), frequency (pitch), and duration of the rhythmic events (Handel, 1984;Handel & Lawson, 1983;Handel & Oshinsky, 1981). At the slowest rate, participants tended to integrate events from superposed pulse trains ("cross-rhythms"), while faster rates yielded more isochronous tapping, with a preference for pulse trains of lower cardinality at the fastest rate.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%