1995
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-60579-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The metatheory of UTT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a decreasing diagram The careful reader could object that our rewriting relations work modulo = α on terms, rather than on = α -equivalence classes of terms, and therefore we should have explicit = α -steps, with a minimal label as required in the corresponding extension of van Oostrom's theorem to rewriting modulo [10]. Renaming of bound variables being so specific an equivalence, we allow ourselves this little glitch, as is customary.…”
Section: Decreasing Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a decreasing diagram The careful reader could object that our rewriting relations work modulo = α on terms, rather than on = α -equivalence classes of terms, and therefore we should have explicit = α -steps, with a minimal label as required in the corresponding extension of van Oostrom's theorem to rewriting modulo [10]. Renaming of bound variables being so specific an equivalence, we allow ourselves this little glitch, as is customary.…”
Section: Decreasing Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dependent type theories, confluence is needed to prove type preservation and termination, making all three properties interdependent if termination is used in the confluence proof. This circularity can be possibly broken in two ways: by proving all properties together within a single induction [9]; or by proving confluence on untyped terms first, and then successively type preservation, confluence on typed terms, and strong normalization. We develop the latter way here, focusing on untyped confluence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type theories thus specified in LF are intensional type theories such as Martin-Löf's intensional type theory [15] and the Unifying Theory of dependent Types (UTT) [10]. Intensional type theories have nice meta-theoretic properties including Church-Rosser, Subject Reduction and Strong Normalisation (see Goguen's thesis on the meta-theory of UTT [4,5]).…”
Section: The Logical Framework Lfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dependent record type is a type of labelled tuples. For instance, ⟨n : N at, v : V ect(n)⟩ is the dependent record type with objects (called records) such as ⟨n = 2, v = [5,6]⟩, where dependency has to be respected: [5,6] must be of type V ect (2).…”
Section: A Formulation Of Dependent Record Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a partial formal proof in COQ [2]. There is a paper proof of DTC for Luo's Extended Calculus of Constructions with weak elimination [3], an extension for the case of strong elimination restricted to a single predicative universe [4], and a paper proof of consistency which includes strong elimination together with arbitrarily many predicative universes [5]. There are paper proofs of DTC for various versions of CIC modulo a theory T [6]- [8], and a formal proof of the last version.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%