2007
DOI: 10.1017/s0956536107000016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Metaphorical Underpinnings of Aztec History

Abstract: The article discusses the 1473 civil war between the two polities that formed the capital of the Aztec empire, Tenochtitlan and Tlatelolco, as presented in the Codex Durán. I argue that the literal, European-style rendition of the events of the war includes remnants of the pre-Conquest symbolic thought behind those events' original choreography. The remnants indicate that the war was staged to follow the outlines of the story of the battle between the god Huitzilopochtli (“Hummingbird, Left”) and his sister Co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This division resonates perfectly with the explanation of the symbolic aspects of the war between the two cities made by Chinchilla Mazariegos (2011), who emphasizes the importance of the hour, precisely at dawn, when the confrontation between Axayacatl and Moquihuixtli took place. The battle between the two Mexica rulers may thus be interpreted as a repetition of the myth of the birth of Huitzilopochtli, the Sun, on top of the mountain Coatepec, where he first had to defeat his sister, Coyolxauhqui, the Moon, to proclaim his rule over the world (Umberger 2007:11–29).What is more, there are many other myths present in different Mesoamerican communities, which in slightly different versions recount the same story of the destruction of a monstrous creature who was trying to shadow the light of the Sun and so claim its power (Chinchilla Mazariegos 2011:82–84).…”
Section: Chalchiuhnenetzin In the Colonial Historical Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This division resonates perfectly with the explanation of the symbolic aspects of the war between the two cities made by Chinchilla Mazariegos (2011), who emphasizes the importance of the hour, precisely at dawn, when the confrontation between Axayacatl and Moquihuixtli took place. The battle between the two Mexica rulers may thus be interpreted as a repetition of the myth of the birth of Huitzilopochtli, the Sun, on top of the mountain Coatepec, where he first had to defeat his sister, Coyolxauhqui, the Moon, to proclaim his rule over the world (Umberger 2007:11–29).What is more, there are many other myths present in different Mesoamerican communities, which in slightly different versions recount the same story of the destruction of a monstrous creature who was trying to shadow the light of the Sun and so claim its power (Chinchilla Mazariegos 2011:82–84).…”
Section: Chalchiuhnenetzin In the Colonial Historical Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tenochca throne was given to Axayacatl against the will of some of the aristocracy, while Nezahualpilli, then only a child, succeeded to rulership in Tetzcoco. Thus, it seemed a perfect moment for Moquihuixtli, the Tlatelolca ruler, to attempt to take over the hegemony in the region (Umberger 2007:12).…”
Section: Chalchiuhnenetzin In the Colonial Historical Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet if Cloud Serpent/Mixcoatl was the title of an important leader during the Late Postclassic period, it seems to have gone largely unremarked by later chroniclers. The Codex Mendoza f. 17v lists a mixcoatl tlacatecuhtli as military governor of Tetenanco, while the title of mixcoatl tlailotlacteuctli is given to a war chief in the Anales de Tlatelolco (Umberger 2007). Barlow (1987:41) also mentions that the mixcoatl tlailotlaque were inspectors of the Aztec markets.…”
Section: Ethnohistorical Parallelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nicholson and Quiñones Keber (1983:94–97) maintained these were produced as acts of “conscious archaism” recalling the Aztec's Toltec heritage, although the details of costume recall Mixteca-Puebla iconographic conventions just as strongly. Umberger (2007) recently argued that the bones found within were the remains of Moquihuix and Teconal, leaders of the rebellious Tlatelolcans. Umberger associates Moquihuix with the feathered serpent vase and Teconal, his war chief, with the Mixcoatl vessel (as she notes [2007:15], the latter may have had the title mixcoatl tlailotlacteuctli ).…”
Section: Ethnohistorical Parallelsmentioning
confidence: 99%