“…Swartz et al (2009) used photometric data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey to look for possible associations of 47 ULXs with SFRs or young superclusters. They found that statistically ULXs are indeed associated with recent star formation (within 1 The following is a list of references for some of the most famous objects with optical counterparts: NGC 5204 X-1 ), NGC 1313 X-1 (Yang et al 2011), ESO 243-49 HLX-1 ) NGC 1313 X-2 (Zampieri et al 2004;Liu et al 2007;Ripamonti et al 2011;Zampieri et al 2012), M81 X-6 (Liu et al 2002;Swartz et al 2003;Moon et al 2011), Holmberg IX X-1 (Grisé, Pakull, & Motch 2006;Moon et al 2011;Grisé et al 2011), Holmberg II X-1 Tao et al 2012b), NGC 5408 X-1 (Lang et al 2007;Grisé et al 2012), M101 X-1 (Kuntz et al 2005;Liu 2009), NGC 4559 , two ULXs in M51 , NGC 2403 X-1 , IC 342 X-1 (Feng & Kaaret 2008), the ULX in NGC 247 ), NGC 6946 X-1 and ULX P13 in NGC 7793 (Pakull et al 2010;Motch et al 2011). 100 pc distance), but no superclusters were detected given the poor spatial resolution of the instrument. Poutanen et al (2012) performed spectral and photometric analyses of clusters associated with the Antennae ULXs and found that almost all are very young (2.4 to 3.2 Myr), and that only one resides inside a cluster (see also Rangelov et al 2012).…”