Metareasoning 2011
DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014809.003.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Metacognitive Loop and Reasoning about Anomalies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, in both cases there is a clear progression as a larger percentage of the window slides into the anomalous region. At first GNG maps to nodes that are slightly anomalous (3,4), then nodes that are moderately anomalous (5,6) and finally those that are fully anomalous (7,8) as the window's back edge enters the anomaly. This pattern is reversed as the window slides out of the anomalous section, showing that the network has generated anomaly prototypes which reflect intensity as well as type.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, in both cases there is a clear progression as a larger percentage of the window slides into the anomalous region. At first GNG maps to nodes that are slightly anomalous (3,4), then nodes that are moderately anomalous (5,6) and finally those that are fully anomalous (7,8) as the window's back edge enters the anomaly. This pattern is reversed as the window slides out of the anomalous section, showing that the network has generated anomaly prototypes which reflect intensity as well as type.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several iterations of MCL have been developed, including domainspecific versions that guide agents to improved performance in Q-learning [2] and natural language dialog [3] systems. A domain-independent version of MCL based on a Bayesian net was also developed [4] and used to guide a simulated mars rover and for other tasks.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in the approach proposed by Schmill et al (2010), a metacognitive loop (MCL) layered architecture is described, which introduces also a metacognitive layer (similar to our second layer, i.e. the action selection -RL layer) aiming to provide robustness to autonomous systems in the presence of unforeseen perturbations.…”
Section: Journal Of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of systems based on available metacognitive models is difficult, since some models are theoretical (Cox, Oates, & Perlis, 2011;Nelson & Narens, 1990) and the computational models (Alonso, Arnold, & Havasi, 2010;Kennedy, 2010;Schmill et al, 2011) do not provide formalisms of software engineering methodologies that allow systematic development. The variety of existing approaches to computational design of metacognitive processes delays the selection process of the design model for any application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%