2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The metabolic syndrome: a cause of sexual dysfunction in women

Abstract: Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) is a significant public health problem. We assessed the prevalence of FSD in premenopausal women with the metabolic syndrome as compared to the general female population. Compared with the control group (N ¼ 80), women with the metabolic syndrome (N ¼ 120) had reduced mean full Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) score (23.275.4 vs 30.174.7, Po0.001), reduced satisfaction rate (3.571.1 vs 4.771.2, Po0.01), and higher circulating levels of C-reactive protein (CRP: 2.2 (0.6/4.9) v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
2
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(10 reference statements)
2
80
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…67 Compared with the control group, women with the metabolic syndrome had reduced mean full FSFI score (23.9 ± 5.4 vs 29.9 ± 4.8, Po0.001). We considered the functional results to be good when the FSFI score was 30 or more, intermediate between 23 and 29, and poor below 23.…”
Section: Obesity Metabolic Syndrome and Female Sexual Functionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…67 Compared with the control group, women with the metabolic syndrome had reduced mean full FSFI score (23.9 ± 5.4 vs 29.9 ± 4.8, Po0.001). We considered the functional results to be good when the FSFI score was 30 or more, intermediate between 23 and 29, and poor below 23.…”
Section: Obesity Metabolic Syndrome and Female Sexual Functionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Multivariate analysis found that physical activity, BMI and C-reactive protein independently Figure 3 Individual domains of female sexual function in women with the metabolic syndrome (SM) and in control women. Adapted from Esposito et al 67 Obesity and sexual dysfunction, male and female K Esposito et al predicted IIEF score and almost explained 68% of the variance. This study provided evidence that sustained lifestyle changes can partially ameliorate erectile function in obese men.…”
Section: Lifestyle and Sexual Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher BMI can result in a higher intraabdominal pressure and in development and recurrence of urinary incontinence [35]. Lower levels of sexual desire and lower frequency of penile-vaginal intercourse were associated with more body fat and larger waist or hip circumference as well as lower arousal, orgasm, and lubrication, when associated with MetS during the premenopausal state [36,37]. Moreover, sexual pain and orgasmic disorder also occur due to hypoestrogenemia [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los factores asociados a la disfunción sexual han sido estudiados por varios autores, registrando el síndrome metabólico como un factor de riesgo independiente (16)(17)(18), la edad, el grado de instrucción, la salud física (19,20) y mental en la mujer (21), aunque otros autores refieren además el estado civil casado, hábito de fumar (22), así como tener más de 14 años de matrimonio, más de 2 hijos, el grado de instrucción, el tener una pareja mayor de 42 años (23) y el uso de terapia antidepresiva (24).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Results: 342 women (114 cases / 228 controls) participated, with a mean age of 40.5 ± 9.2 and a BMI of 25.2 ± 3.5; 45.9% (157) are married; 53.5% (183) with secondary level, 41.5% (142) housewives, 17.8% (61) menopausal, 34.8% (119) with metabolic syndrome. In addition, with chronic disease, 32.7% (112), anxiety 16.4% (56), depression 5% (17), drug consumption 35.1% (72). In the bivariate analysis, the factors of widowhood, retired occupation, 2 previous pregnancies, ill health, chronic illness, smoking, anxiety and depression, and as a protective factor, married marital status and higher educational level as associated factors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%