1983
DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(83)91218-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The metabolic defect of methionine dependence occurs frequently in human tumor cell lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
115
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
115
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that growth arrest by methionine restriction may be related to the role of methionine as a methyl donor for methylation of DNA, RNA and proteins (Lu and Epner, 2000). Interestingly, normal cells are able to grow in culture when methionine is substituted with homocysteine because mammalian cells can convert homocysteine to methionine (Stern and Hoffman, 1986), but most cancer cells fail to grow in the absence of methionine, even when supplemented with homocysteine (Halpern et al, 1974;Mecham et al, 1983;Stern and Hoffman, 1986), which may result from the elevated levels of transmethylation in cancer cells as compared with normal cells (Tisdale, 1980;Stern and Hoffman, 1984;Judde et al, 1989). It was recently reported that telomeric recombination was elevated by a decrease in methylation of sub-telomeric regions in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells deficient for DNA Figure 5 Correlation among TRF1, TRF2, TIN2 and RAP1 foci in IIICF/c cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that growth arrest by methionine restriction may be related to the role of methionine as a methyl donor for methylation of DNA, RNA and proteins (Lu and Epner, 2000). Interestingly, normal cells are able to grow in culture when methionine is substituted with homocysteine because mammalian cells can convert homocysteine to methionine (Stern and Hoffman, 1986), but most cancer cells fail to grow in the absence of methionine, even when supplemented with homocysteine (Halpern et al, 1974;Mecham et al, 1983;Stern and Hoffman, 1986), which may result from the elevated levels of transmethylation in cancer cells as compared with normal cells (Tisdale, 1980;Stern and Hoffman, 1984;Judde et al, 1989). It was recently reported that telomeric recombination was elevated by a decrease in methylation of sub-telomeric regions in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells deficient for DNA Figure 5 Correlation among TRF1, TRF2, TIN2 and RAP1 foci in IIICF/c cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, availability of homocysteine does not rescue cancer cells from their methionine dependence. [5][6][7][8] Importantly, remethylation of homocysteine to generate methionine appears to be unaffected in cancer cells. 9 Cancer cell methionine dependency is well-documented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Consistent with a specific effect of methionine restriction non-transformed cells but leads to cell proliferation block in many cancer cells. 6,7,10,11 Relatively little was known about methionine dependency of breast cancer cells. We therefore analyzed growth of various breast cancer cell lines in growth medium with (Met+) or without (Met-Hcy+) methionine (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methionine dependence, the elevated minimal methionine requirement for cell growth relative to normal cells, has been observed in many human cancer cell lines and cancer xenografts in animal models (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). Methionine dependence is a metabolic defect seen only in cancer cells and precludes the cells from growing in media in which methionine is depleted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%