2022
DOI: 10.1111/acps.13484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The metabolic adverse effects of antipsychotic use in individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disability: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disability (IDD) are often prescribed antipsychotics (APs). However, despite their known propensity to cause metabolic adverse effects, including weight gain, diabetes, and increased risk of cardiovascular events, there is currently a limited body of literature describing the metabolic consequences of AP use in this population. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases to identify all randomized trials that reported on the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
(172 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in the number of prescriptions and the frequent off-label use imply careful assessment of the risk/benefit ratio before prescription of SSRIs and SGAs, as well as regular monitoring of adverse effects to optimize patient care. Indeed, use of these drugs for children and adolescents not only sets up an already vulnerable population for side effects at an early age but also represents a significant gap in the literature, especially due to the scarcity of safety-and tolerability-controlled clinical studies with respect to adulthood [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in the number of prescriptions and the frequent off-label use imply careful assessment of the risk/benefit ratio before prescription of SSRIs and SGAs, as well as regular monitoring of adverse effects to optimize patient care. Indeed, use of these drugs for children and adolescents not only sets up an already vulnerable population for side effects at an early age but also represents a significant gap in the literature, especially due to the scarcity of safety-and tolerability-controlled clinical studies with respect to adulthood [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%