SAE Technical Paper Series 1998
DOI: 10.4271/980765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Meta VVH System - A Continuously Variable Valve Timing System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative wear for warm-compacted and sintered 7.1 g/cm 3 sprockets is greater than that for conventional sprockets. However, the relative wear for warm-compacted and sintered 7.2 g/cm 3 sprockets is less than that for conventional sprockets. Special alloys are unnecessary with warm compaction, which is an advantage in terms of recycling materials.…”
Section: Case Study 2: Warm Compactionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The relative wear for warm-compacted and sintered 7.1 g/cm 3 sprockets is greater than that for conventional sprockets. However, the relative wear for warm-compacted and sintered 7.2 g/cm 3 sprockets is less than that for conventional sprockets. Special alloys are unnecessary with warm compaction, which is an advantage in terms of recycling materials.…”
Section: Case Study 2: Warm Compactionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…9) Figure 5 shows the relative wear of conventional P/M alloy steel sprockets and warm-compacted sprockets. The relative wear for warm-compacted and sintered 7.1 g/cm 3 sprockets is greater than that for conventional sprockets. However, the relative wear for warm-compacted and sintered 7.2 g/cm 3 sprockets is less than that for conventional sprockets.…”
Section: Case Study 2: Warm Compactionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, such devices can be complex, bulky, and relatively expensive, so their applications tend to be limited. Figure 1 [5, 14,25,37] lists the works known to the applicants with comparisons on features and capabilities. It is noted that the Ford design has more features than others, but has not advanced to full engine operations.…”
Section: Background and Technical Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%