2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conference 2006
DOI: 10.1109/wcpec.2006.279872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Messenger Spacecraft Solar Array Design and Early Mission Performance

Abstract: The MESSENGER (MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging) spacecraft was launched in 2004 and will be inserted into Mercury orbit in March 2011 for one year of orbital operation. The large solar distance variations from 1 AU near Earth to 0.3 AU near Mercury impose severe requirements on the solar array design. The solar cell strings were placed between Optical Solar Reflector (OSR) mirrors with a cell to OSR ratio of 1:2 to reduce the panel absorbance. Thermal control is performed by tilti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example of a mission with solar panels designed to operate at high solar flux using the technique of limiting the incident flux to the array and modifying solar absorption α, the "MESSENGER" mission to orbit Mercury 14 has designed an array with mirrored optical surface reflectors covering replacing approximately 70% of the solar cells across the surface area of the array 15 . These panels reflect 70% of the incident solar energy, and hence reduce the operating temperature.…”
Section: Messenger Array: An Approach To Solar Arrays For a Near mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an example of a mission with solar panels designed to operate at high solar flux using the technique of limiting the incident flux to the array and modifying solar absorption α, the "MESSENGER" mission to orbit Mercury 14 has designed an array with mirrored optical surface reflectors covering replacing approximately 70% of the solar cells across the surface area of the array 15 . These panels reflect 70% of the incident solar energy, and hence reduce the operating temperature.…”
Section: Messenger Array: An Approach To Solar Arrays For a Near mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mirrors incorporate a high-emissivity silica coating, allowing efficient thermal radiation. These panels have operated (at the first Mercury fly-by) at distance of 0.4 AU from the sun 15 , and have been qualified in thermal vacuum testing to be capable of operating as close as 0.25 AU from the sun, at an intensity of 16 times the intensity at Earth orbit 16 . The arrays use off-pointing to reduce the incident intensity at Mercury; however, the arrays were designed to tolerate the full on-sun thermal regime, in the case of a pointing failure.…”
Section: Messenger Array: An Approach To Solar Arrays For a Near mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Spectrally-selective reflective coatings • Solar cells designed to operate at high temperature, with low temperature coefficient κ • Solar arrays incorporating added thermal radiators As an example of a mission with solar panels designed to operate at high solar flux using the technique of limiting the incident flux to the array and modifying solar absorption α, the "MESSENGER" mission to orbit Mercury [8] has designed an array with mirrored panels to reflect 7-% of the incident solar energy to limit operating temperature [9,10]. The mirrors incorporate a highemissivity silica coating, allowing efficient thermal radiation.…”
Section: Approaches To Solar Arrays For Near Sun Missionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, solar cells for space environments also encounter high operating temperatures. Typical solar module temperatures for Earth orbit missions are typically in excess of 60 °C , and missions to investigate the solar system in close proximity to the Sun, such as the BepiColombo and Messenger missions, result in cell temperatures well in excess of 200 °C. In this paper, we compare the performance of InP‐based bulk TJs and QWTJs between room temperature and 220 °C and aim to understand the performance degradation mechanisms affecting the tunnel junctions at high temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%