Predator—Prey Interactions in the Fossil Record 2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0161-9_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mesozoic Marine Revolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
74
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main layers affecting to the mechanical strength are mesostracum and in lesser extent hypostracum. Periostracum layer has the lowest participation in mechanical protection (Harper and Skelton 1993;Ishikawa and Kase 2007). Mesostracum exhibits various crystals orientations in different bivalve species as was shown in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The main layers affecting to the mechanical strength are mesostracum and in lesser extent hypostracum. Periostracum layer has the lowest participation in mechanical protection (Harper and Skelton 1993;Ishikawa and Kase 2007). Mesostracum exhibits various crystals orientations in different bivalve species as was shown in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…in Pecten maximus (Linnaeus, 1758). Scallops belong to the socalled free lying bivalve molluscs, therefore, they are the most exposed for potential attack (Harper and Skelton 1993;Piechocki 2009;Brom et al 2016). The bivalve M. edulis represent epifaunal mode of life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Whereas the shell as a whole may be primarily for protection of the soft tissue inside the bivalve shell, ornamentation on the shell may serve a variety of purposes. Bivalve ornamentation has been postulated to be important for a variety of functions including maintaining a stable life position in the sediment, burrowing, shell strengthening, directing inhalant and exhalant currents, and protecting against predators (e.g., Trueman et al 1966;Carter 1967Carter , 1968Kauffman 1969;Stanley 1970Stanley , 1981Stanley , 1988Aller 1974;Thomas 1975;Arua and Hoque 1987;Harper and Skelton 1993;Kelley and Hansen 1996;Stone 1998;Harper and Kelley 2012). An anti-predatory function of ornamentation has also been suggested for Paleozoic and Mesozoic brachiopods (Leighton 2001(Leighton , 2003Vörös 2010;Johnsen et al 2013), Cretaceous and Paleogene ostracods (Reyment 1967;Reyment et al 1987), Jurassic nautiloids and ammonoids (Bardhan and Halder 2000;Kröger 2002), modern barnacles (Palmer 1982), and modern and fossil marine and continental gastropods (e.g., Bertness and Cunningham 1981;Arua and Hoque 1987;Donovan et al 1999;Paul et al 2013;Liew and Schilthuizen 2014), although Yochelson et al (1983) suggested that predation intensity on the sub-Holocene scaphopod Dentalium laqueatum increased with more ribs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%