1988
DOI: 10.1016/0305-4179(88)90047-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mesh skin graft—true expansion rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that the meshed skin can be expended to cover wounds larger than the donor site. 35,36 Our results have demonstrated that 0.9 mm diameter MFUS is suitable size for large full-thickness skin wound healing without hurting the donor side tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…It has been reported that the meshed skin can be expended to cover wounds larger than the donor site. 35,36 Our results have demonstrated that 0.9 mm diameter MFUS is suitable size for large full-thickness skin wound healing without hurting the donor side tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The average expansion rates of skin grafts were not as high as the values claimed by the manufacturers of mesh devices. Previous studies reported that 1.5:1 meshed skin grafts expanded to 1.23 times or 1.27 ± 0.15 times, 1,2 and that 3:1 meshed skin grafts expanded to 1.59 ± 0.15 times 2,3 . The reason why the actual skin grafts do not achieve the claimed expansion rates may be due to the thickness of skin grafts and their elasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Regarding expansion of meshed skin grafts, the measurement of skin grafts before and after the mesh processing revealed that mesh devices provided lower expansion rates compared with those claimed by manufactures. [1][2][3] In surgical procedures, the area of the donor sites to cover the target recipient sites depends not only on the expansion rate of mesh devices but also on shrinkage of harvested skin grafts and the shape of recipient sites. However, knowledge is lacking concerning the correlation, or coverage rate, between the area of donor sites and that of recipient sites covered by meshed grafts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that the meshed skin can be expended to cover wounds larger than the donor site. [28] However, it is difficult to keep all functional organs for full thickness skin wound regeneration if the size of the meshed skin is too small. Our results indicated that 1 mm diameter microskin particle is an MFUS for full thickness skin healing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%