Through the lens of a contemporary antifemale genital mutilation discourse, this field note provides background on how psychoanalysts and feminists have written about the practice of female circumcision. The authors provide preliminary ethnographic data, obtained from women and men in two indigenous groups in Kenya, on the subjects' firsthand views of the practice. Their views are consistent with control of women's sexuality, but also implicate an adjacent discourse on blame and responsibility for HIV. These findings are considered in terms of how political stances are affected by insider and outsider positioning and the role of judgment in political activism.Female circumcision is a tradition that has been practiced globally for hundreds of years. The practice is known to occur in 28 African countries, as well as in a smaller number of countries in Asia and the Middle East (World Health Organization [WHO], 1997). Current estimates suggest that over 130 million women worldwide have been circumcised (WHO). Despite the significant number of women who have been through this experience, those living in the West often have little firsthand experience with the practice.Nonetheless, the merits, purpose and cultural significance of female circumcision have been the subject of longstanding international political discussion. The debate has been fueled by questions about the safety of the practice, as well as by the conviction that circumcision limits a woman's r