2010
DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.109.026757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mental Capacity Act 2005: review of mental capacity assessment in people with proximal femoral fracture

Abstract: Aims and methodTo ascertain whether patients with proximal femoral fractures were being correctly assessed in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Fifty people admitted with proximal femoral fractures were audited to assess whether they had given consent to treatment in accordance with the Act. A Mental Capacity Act 2005 guidance and assessment form was then introduced accompanied by staff training. A re-audit was undertaken to assess the impact.ResultsThe initial audit showed that only one person (2%) had … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar assessment tool is already available at the PRUH and its use and subsequent filing under a designated folder would be encouraged. This recommendation is in line with the report of a recently published audit, which suggests that assessment tools can help improve the compliance of clinicians with the Mental Capacity Act Code of Practice (Guvyer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…A similar assessment tool is already available at the PRUH and its use and subsequent filing under a designated folder would be encouraged. This recommendation is in line with the report of a recently published audit, which suggests that assessment tools can help improve the compliance of clinicians with the Mental Capacity Act Code of Practice (Guvyer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…A number of participants described using a local proforma to structure their assessments and their documentation and finding this helpful. Previous studies have described similar initiatives that have facilitated assessments [15,32,36,37]. This finding suggests that staff identify a need for support with assessment of capacity and are keen to use tools and resources to facilitate specific aspects of their practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Several studies also investigated the quality of assessment practice [32,34,35,37,41,43,[45][46][47][50][51][52] and the experiences of professionals who complete assessments [34,45,52]. Five studies [35,42,44,47,51] described the effects on practice of an intervention designed to facilitate or improve assessment. Study participants were multidisciplinary health and social care professionals working in both hospital and community settings with a range of service user groups.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies [35,36,43,45,52] indicated that formal assessment processes were not always used. Evidence from three studies [33,34,52] suggested formal assessments were often only carried out when patients disagreed with professional recommendations about which decision option might be most suitable.…”
Section: Practice That Is Not Compliant With the Mcamentioning
confidence: 99%