2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Recommendations for Prostate Cancer Screening

Abstract: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) recommendations on prostate cancer screening were developed in response to three limitations of previous screening guidelines: insufficient evidence-base, failure to link screening with treatment, and lack of risk stratification. The objective of the recommendations is to provide a schema for prostate cancer screening that maximizes the benefits, in terms of reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality, and minimizes the harms, in terms of overdiagnosis and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We would first note that the overall strategy in Göteborg –screening every two years, median starting age in the mid-fifties[7] – is closer to current US and European guidelines[2-5] than the ERSPC as a whole (median starting age in the early sixties, screening every four years)[19]. As we have argued previously [27], the Göteborg trial would underestimate the mortality benefits of screening due to sub-optimal methods of detection (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would first note that the overall strategy in Göteborg –screening every two years, median starting age in the mid-fifties[7] – is closer to current US and European guidelines[2-5] than the ERSPC as a whole (median starting age in the early sixties, screening every four years)[19]. As we have argued previously [27], the Göteborg trial would underestimate the mortality benefits of screening due to sub-optimal methods of detection (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[53] Long-term data from the Malmö Preventive Project suggests that men aged 60 with a PSA level < 1.0 ng/ml can possibly refrain from further testing. [7, 54, 55]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches includes better stratifying baseline risk and adapting re-screening intervals according to a man’s age, general health and PSA level[7] as well as using multivariable approaches to help biopsy decision-making including reflex biomarkers[6] or risk calculators[15]. MRI is also emerging as a potentially promising tool in the pre-diagnostic setting as well as to guide targeted biopsies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk of prostate cancer is predicted by PSA level (25) with recent recommendations suggesting different approaches to men using PSA cut off levels of <1, 1–3, and >3 ng/ml (26). …”
Section: Explanation Of Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%