1996
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.153.5.659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Melbourne Family Grief Study, II: Psychosocial morbidity and grief in bereaved families

Abstract: More intense grief and greater psychosocial morbidity are found in sullen, hostile, and intermediate bereaved families than in the more adaptive supportive and conflict-resolving types. At-risk families are identifiable and could be treated preventively to reduce morbidity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,13,14 FRI comprises three subscales: 1) cohesiveness (e.g., “There is a feeling of togetherness in our family”), 2) expressiveness (e.g., “We tell each other about our personal problems”), and 3) conflict resolving (e.g., “Family members fight a lot”). The subscales form a global measure of family interaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11,13,14 FRI comprises three subscales: 1) cohesiveness (e.g., “There is a feeling of togetherness in our family”), 2) expressiveness (e.g., “We tell each other about our personal problems”), and 3) conflict resolving (e.g., “Family members fight a lot”). The subscales form a global measure of family interaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The remaining family type, 5) intermediate , reported moderately reduced cohesiveness 11 and also carried high rates of poorer psychosocial outcomes. 13 Although families are never labeled as such in the clinical setting, screening for “risk” by identifying more difficult interpersonal relations allows the offer of adjuvant family-centered services, including family therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family conflict is correlated with distress, loneliness, and abandonment of hospice patients, 1,2 and has adverse impacts on caregivers, resulting in poor mental health, a greater perceived burden, anger and depression, and grief. [2][3][4][5] Furthermore, family conflict makes it difficult to deal with the needs of the patient and family, and interferes with providing highquality end-of life (EOL) care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hostile families are chaotic and help-rejecting, while sullen families carry the highest rates of depression, yet show willingness to accept help (Kissane et al , 2003). The fifth type, called ‘intermediate’, shows moderately-reduced cohesiveness (Kissane, Bloch & Dowe et al, 1996), with its members also at heightened risk of poorer psychosocial outcomes (Kissane, Bloch & Onghena et al , 1996). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%